Laserfiche WebLink
i 'li <br />I CITY <br />I 11 ORONO <br />Ei. J <br />City of OROIVO <br />RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br />NO. 2292_________ <br />the meetings for Application No. 1129, the applicants <br />anSTo^^gents failed to correct the City in their formal findings of <br />May 1, 1987, as set forth in Resolution No. 2172, that the majority <br />of drainage from the property drains to rear of the house to a <br />retention area. The surveys submitted with Land Use Application #1129 <br />dated 3/10/87 and the survey submitted with the building permit <br />application dated 5/8/87 failed to show the catch basin and the <br />underground tile. <br />32. The general contractor's claim that he received only a permit <br />application form is not possible. Such forms are not single sheet <br />handouts but are included with other informational sheets and forms <br />that attempt to assist the applicant through the plan review process <br />and also ensure the City that all necessary information is received <br />with the building plans. The permit application and other handouts <br />are stapled together. Furthermore, the applicants' building permit <br />has staple marks in the left hand corner which is evidence of the fact <br />that he received the necessary information and request for information <br />from the City. <br />33. The applicants have been allowed to occupy the residence under <br />special conditions of a Temporary Certificate Occupancy until all <br />violations have been resolved against the property by Juno 15, 1988. <br />34. The major land alterations conducted within the lakeshore <br />protected area (0-75 feet from lakeshore) and the alterations of an <br />existing drainage area involving a five+ acre watershed are found to <br />be in complete conflict with the following principals and goals set <br />forth in Orono's Community Management Plan. <br />SHORFLAND. Ft-OOD PLAN AND .9TQRM WATER CONSIDERATIONS. - C.M.P. 3-9 <br />ORONO'S MANY MILES OF SHORELINE ARE ESPECIALLY SENSITIVE TO MISUSE OR <br />OVERDEVELOPMENT. As the interface between land and water, the shoreline <br />is ever changing. Shorelines are subject to continual erosion by wave <br />action, ice buildup or unstable soil conditions. Droughts dry out <br />vegetation and heavy rains or snow melt cause land slipage. <br />On top of these natural pressures, nan is drawn to the lake and the <br />shoreline often becomes his battleground with nature. Lake access often <br />means active use and construction of buildings and structures causing <br />unnatural soil loadings, vegetation removal, and land alteration. Exposed <br />soil becomes more subject to erosion and man-made hardcover increases <br />direct runoff quantity and speed. Power boats increase wave action and. <br />more damaging, stir up <br />increased turbidity. <br />the lake bottom causing release of nutrients and <br />The impact, of course, <br />access and a change in <br />is a degradation of water quality, impaired lake <br />the natural aesthetics which drew people to the <br />shore in the first place. Legal considerations become entangled when <br />lot descriptions conflict or become inconsistent due to changing water <br />levels or shoreline locations. Therefore, planning considerations must <br />recognize the desirability of human interaction with the lake while at <br />the same time providing for protection of nature's sensitively balanced <br />shoreline ecology. Page 9 of 13