My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1987-11-09 Resolution #2292
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
C
>
Casco Point Road
>
3061 Casco Point Road - 20-117-23-34-0017
>
Resolutions
>
1987-11-09 Resolution #2292
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/27/2024 10:32:45 AM
Creation date
11/27/2024 9:26:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
x Address Old
House Number
3061
Street Name
Casco Point
Street Type
Road
Address
3061 Casco Point Road
PIN
2011723340017
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
i 'li <br />I CITY <br />I 11 ORONO <br />Ei. J <br />City of OROIVO <br />RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br />NO. 2292_________ <br />the meetings for Application No. 1129, the applicants <br />anSTo^^gents failed to correct the City in their formal findings of <br />May 1, 1987, as set forth in Resolution No. 2172, that the majority <br />of drainage from the property drains to rear of the house to a <br />retention area. The surveys submitted with Land Use Application #1129 <br />dated 3/10/87 and the survey submitted with the building permit <br />application dated 5/8/87 failed to show the catch basin and the <br />underground tile. <br />32. The general contractor's claim that he received only a permit <br />application form is not possible. Such forms are not single sheet <br />handouts but are included with other informational sheets and forms <br />that attempt to assist the applicant through the plan review process <br />and also ensure the City that all necessary information is received <br />with the building plans. The permit application and other handouts <br />are stapled together. Furthermore, the applicants' building permit <br />has staple marks in the left hand corner which is evidence of the fact <br />that he received the necessary information and request for information <br />from the City. <br />33. The applicants have been allowed to occupy the residence under <br />special conditions of a Temporary Certificate Occupancy until all <br />violations have been resolved against the property by Juno 15, 1988. <br />34. The major land alterations conducted within the lakeshore <br />protected area (0-75 feet from lakeshore) and the alterations of an <br />existing drainage area involving a five+ acre watershed are found to <br />be in complete conflict with the following principals and goals set <br />forth in Orono's Community Management Plan. <br />SHORFLAND. Ft-OOD PLAN AND .9TQRM WATER CONSIDERATIONS. - C.M.P. 3-9 <br />ORONO'S MANY MILES OF SHORELINE ARE ESPECIALLY SENSITIVE TO MISUSE OR <br />OVERDEVELOPMENT. As the interface between land and water, the shoreline <br />is ever changing. Shorelines are subject to continual erosion by wave <br />action, ice buildup or unstable soil conditions. Droughts dry out <br />vegetation and heavy rains or snow melt cause land slipage. <br />On top of these natural pressures, nan is drawn to the lake and the <br />shoreline often becomes his battleground with nature. Lake access often <br />means active use and construction of buildings and structures causing <br />unnatural soil loadings, vegetation removal, and land alteration. Exposed <br />soil becomes more subject to erosion and man-made hardcover increases <br />direct runoff quantity and speed. Power boats increase wave action and. <br />more damaging, stir up <br />increased turbidity. <br />the lake bottom causing release of nutrients and <br />The impact, of course, <br />access and a change in <br />is a degradation of water quality, impaired lake <br />the natural aesthetics which drew people to the <br />shore in the first place. Legal considerations become entangled when <br />lot descriptions conflict or become inconsistent due to changing water <br />levels or shoreline locations. Therefore, planning considerations must <br />recognize the desirability of human interaction with the lake while at <br />the same time providing for protection of nature's sensitively balanced <br />shoreline ecology. Page 9 of 13
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.