My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-13-1990 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1990
>
08-13-1990 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/26/2024 1:32:05 PM
Creation date
11/26/2024 1:29:09 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
724
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
72590.3 <br />TO: Mayor and City Council <br />FROM: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Admin is tratorij <br />DATE: August 9, 1990 <br />SUBJECT: Hardcover Variance Protection <br />'i- ihi’j <br />r: 13; <br />Attachment: A. Standard Language for Hardcover Variances <br />B. Mike Gaffron Memo Dated 8/9/90 <br />ISSUE - At th<5 Council's July 23, 1990 meeting Counc i Imember <br />Callahan raised the issue regarding hardcover growth on selected <br />properties. In particular he cited the Foster “nd Nelson <br />applications in which new property owners found that when they <br />wanted to do improvements to the property were substantially in <br />excess of hardcover variances granted to a previous owner. While <br />they may have been not granted any variances absence removals <br />within the existing variance numbers, the e)cess hardcover, these <br />unauthorized increases made it that much more difficult for them <br />to deal with getting a variance. As noted above since 1985 the <br />City has used the standardized language 'n Attachment A in <br />inclusion in all hat.Icover variances. These have teen filed with <br />the chain of title (al*-bough the Hennepin County Recorder's <br />Office has been reluctant to take these with registered <br />property.) While listed, the a is nothing that alerts a title <br />exam.ner to the fact that chis may be a problem for the <br />purchaser. <br />DISCUSSION - The City currently deals with hardcover on a <br />property when the owner is looking to make some permanent <br />structural improvements. '^hese hardcover regulations have been <br />in effect since the 70's. Over that period these have gone, <br />although placed in cid'nance, from being "a guideline" to being a <br />significant stand&rr. to bo dealt with. In that period of time <br />the issue has gone iron, being a kind of "eye ball" look to a very <br />refined objective mo -surement. An additional change has been <br />definition of what has been considered hardcover with <br />plastic/punch plastic and permeable £ brie being the most "gray <br />area". While hardcover over those numbers on any property does <br />represent a violation of the zoning code the City has never taken <br />the position of dealing with it on more than additions, <br />remodelings or developments. <br />The following represent alternatives to consider for dealing with <br />hardcover. <br />A. Comprehensive Hardcover Inventory - The City could <br />explore establishing a hardcover inventory for all <br />properties that do fall within the category. This would <br />either necessitate each property within a 1,000 feet o^ <br />the lakeshore to have a survey done or in manner similar
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.