08-13-1990 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

®xpc*?ss reservations. The general issues related to any developer's fee ate as follows: Caoital versus Operations - Generally dedication are ioc caoi til" expend! tut es only, it is expected that operational expenditures would be handled by existing tax base for Lhe portion of operations used by the current users and new'tax base for the use by the new development. capital Costs Split - To the extent that any new 73^^17 ri” soley for use by new development, the total should be paid by the developers. However, for those facilities which there is service to both current development and new development and necessitated by both it is felt the issue relates as to how that is s?lit. (It is assumed that costs for current “sers would ^ithe be through general tax base or some type of assessment.) How Constructed and Paid - construction - Either built by the developer or by contract and'construction under City auspices. rlnancinq - Privately - ^>tber paid , ivately by the developer and ilnaiiced in either private sales mortgage costs. Publicly - Payment can either be through a levriopet’s payment up front or an assessment. zSninV s'taSJafd"\ht'c~\Ty |«”'iyTtem\'’VVhe"?0-3°0% of thi land that is left undeveloped awaiting to be subdivided. that new units create a potential impact on the park syst-m. The use of park land falls into three catagories. open space - This element recognises the benefit^ toj ^iTv oT^eas which are not built on. *n urban environment of central cities, such open space is Critical and"“in many of the redevelopments do"e in the central cities they work to free up open space for small Hrks and plazas. In a suburban area because of the larger sized lots this is not as critical an issue. Pa,!«ive Park Space - This represents the for ^mizttTSH"ar^wn on the Comprehensive Plan that