Laserfiche WebLink
Park Commission reviwed the issues at their August 7th meeting <br />and decided to table for consideration at their next meeting. <br />(Attachment Cis drafted as a response to Mr. VanEeckhout.) <br />ALTERNATIVES - <br />1. Accept the information. <br />2. Indicate what action, if any, the Council desires. <br />3. Refer to Park Commission any or all of the issues for further <br />review and comment. <br />4. Take no action. <br />RECOM!!ENDATION - It is recommended that Council tab* pending <br />recommendation by the Park Commission on repealing the action on <br />payment of previously subdivided properties. At present while <br />there is no direct statutory authority for such has not been <br />ruled legal. (The policy arguement could be made that the new <br />home will place a burden on the park system and those previously <br />developed were "just lucky".) Staff does have a substantial <br />concern on the fairness as this impact will fall directly on <br />somebody who has acquired a piece of property and being faced at <br />the time of building permit with a park dedication fee. This is <br />a different situation than a person acquiring a piece of property <br />from someone who has subdivided the property with the park <br />dedication already built into the purchase price. Additionally <br />we are not aware of other cities that do require it for property <br />owners in the category of previously subdivided property paying <br />at time of building permit. <br />PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by _, seconded by , that the Council <br />table consideration pending a recommendaTIon from the Park <br />Commission. Ayes _, Nays _. <br />cc: John R. Gerhardson, Public Works Director