My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1993-06-14 Resolution #3273
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
C
>
Casco Point Road
>
3035 Casco Point Road - 20-117-23-34-0001
>
Resolutions
>
1993-06-14 Resolution #3273
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/21/2024 3:25:08 PM
Creation date
11/21/2024 3:20:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
x Address Old
House Number
3035
Street Name
Casco Point
Street Type
Road
Address
3035 Casco Point Road
PIN
2011723340006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
r <br />CITY of ORONO <br />RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br />NO. •• •_______ <br />2. <br />3. <br />5. <br />The property is located in the LR-IC, Lakeshore Residential Zoning District <br />requiring 1/2 acre or 21,780 s.f. The property consists of .55 acres or 24,130 <br />s.f. <br />The Orono Planning Coininission reviewed this application on April 19, 1993, <br />and reconunended approval of the proposed variances based on the following <br />hardships and findings: <br />A.The property exceeds the required area for the zoning district but has an <br />unus^ narrow shape. <br />B The location of saucture on property <br />C. There is no adjacent land available. <br />D. Neighbor ’s drive and turnaround encroaches on applicants’ property <br />adding 7.7% hardcover within the 75-250’ setback area and 6.7% within <br />the 250-500’ setback area. <br />The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar <br />to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that <br />granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor <br />pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not inerely <br />serve as a convenience to the applicants, but is necessary to alleviate a <br />demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substan^ property <br />right of the applicants; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the <br />Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. <br />The City Council has considered this application including the findings and <br />recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments <br />by the applicants and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and <br />welfare of the community. <br />Page 2 of 5
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.