Laserfiche WebLink
fr- <br />. > <br />M > <br />CITY <br />OF <br />ORONO <br />City of ORONO <br />RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br />NO. 2869_________ <br />A RESOLUTION GRANTING <br />PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF A <br />PLAT AT 3020/3030 CASCO POINT ROAD <br />FILE NO. 1573 <br />WHEREAS, Carol J. Kelly and James Massey on July 26, <br />1990 filed a formal subdivision application with the City for <br />approval of a 3-lot residential plat of property legally <br />described as follows: <br />Tract T and Tract U, Registered Land Survey #461, Files of <br />the Registrar of Titles, Hennepin County, Minnesota, <br />(hereinafter "the property") and; <br />WHEREAS, after due published and mailed notice in <br />accordance with Minnesota Statues 462.358 et. seg. and the City <br />of Orono Zoning and Platting Codes, the Orono Planning Commission <br />held a public hearing on August 20, 1990 at which times all <br />persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were <br />given the opportunity to speak thereon; and <br />* <br />^ • <br />WHEREAS, a'- their regular meeting held on SepternWr 10, <br />1990 the Orono City Council considered the subdivision <br />application of Carol J. Kelly and James Massey (hereinafter "the <br />subdividers"), noting the following findings of fact; <br />1. The property is located within the LR-IC Single Family <br />Lakeshore Residential Zoning District requiring a minimum of <br />1/2 acre of contiguous dry buildable land within each newly <br />created lot. <br />2. The property contains a total of approximately 1.87 <br />acres. Portions of the property are intersected by a public <br />drainageway, yet all lots are able to be platted such that <br />each lot maintains 1/2 acre dry contiguous building <br />envelope. <br />3. Each lot meets the required lot width to the rear of the <br />front yard setback line and at the 75' lakeshore setback <br />line measured from the 929.4 elevation. <br />4. Lots 1 and 3 can continue to be residentially developed <br />without the need for variances to the LR-IC zoning <br />standards. Lot 2, the undeveloped lot, can be residential ly <br />developed without the neecj for variances to the LR-IC <br />standards. <br />Page 1 of 4