My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-23-1990 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1990
>
07-23-1990 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2024 2:17:32 PM
Creation date
11/19/2024 2:14:31 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
303
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLAT OF <br />MACMILLAN ADDITION <br />PILE NO. 1516 <br />WHEREASr the City of Orono is a municipal corporation <br />organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; <br />and <br />WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Orono has <br />adopted subdivision regulations for the orderly, economic and <br />safe development of land within the City; and <br />WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the <br />application for a subdivision by Mr. & Mrs. Whitney MacMillan <br />etal., the subdividers; and <br />WHEREAS, on May 29, 1990 the City Council approved <br />Resolution #2808 granting preliminary approval for a plat at <br />1560/1580/1620 Fox Street; and <br />WHEREAS, the proposed plat contains 4 lots, each <br />exceeding the 2.0 acre minimum lot area requirement and each <br />containing in excess of the required 200* lot width as measured <br />at the rear of the defined front yard. Lots 2 and 3, Block 1 and <br />Lot 1, Block 2 require a variance because they do not have <br />frontage on a public roadway; and <br />WHEREAS, the subdivision has been found to meet all <br />other standards of the RR-IB zoning district finding that each <br />lot is of a size and configuration that will allow its use for a <br />single family residence to be fully developed without the need of <br />further variances; and <br />WHEREAS, a variance is required for continued existence <br />of a tennis court within Lot 1, Block 1 which does not meet the <br />50' rear setback required by Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.03, <br />Subdivision 14 (D); and <br />WHEREAS, a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section <br />10.03, Subdivision 9 (D) is required for the detached garage to <br />remain in the defined front yard of Lot 3, Block 1; and <br />WHEREAS, all four lots have been proven to contain <br />adequate primary and/or alternate drainfield sites to serve the <br />proposed or existing single family residences; and <br />Page 1 of 4
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.