My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-23-1990 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1990
>
07-23-1990 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2024 2:17:32 PM
Creation date
11/19/2024 2:14:31 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
303
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OP THE ORONO COUNCIL MEETING OP DECEMBER 11, 1989 <br />ZONING PILE #1445'PETERSON <br />said that in his mind, the fence is around the pool area. Mr. <br />Peterson said he never referred to the fence being around the <br />pool. In Mr. Peterson's opinion, the backyard is the pool area. <br />He asked why there was no specific mention, other than reference <br />to height, in the resolution, to where the fence is to be <br />located. He said they have done everything as they said they <br />were going to do. <br />Mrs. Petersen said they do not have a large enough yard to <br />have various fences breaking up the amount of area. She said <br />that 5' security is imperative because there is a playground <br />right across the street. <br />Counci I-!inofer Callahan said that he recollected that the <br />discussions at the Council Meeting centered around the pool, the <br />variance needed to put in the pool, and the requirements of the <br />insurance company to protect the pool with a fence. Callahan <br />said that the Council never thought, or thinks now, that they <br />gave approval for the fence that now exists, Callahan said that <br />there may be a misunderstanding, but he does not believe it 13 <br />proper to leave the fence in the right-of-way. Callahan said <br />that he could not allow a pool to be installed in that <br />neighborhood without fencing around it. Callahan said that w lat <br />is left to be decided is how to screen the pool and what <br />variances are required to accomplish that, <br />Mr. Peterson said that many of the decisions they have made <br />in regard to the pool were based on the appi. .val given. He said <br />that at no time did he say ai ything other than 'ey intended to <br />replace the existing feeing. <br />Counci1memter Callahan said that <br />replacement of a fence being discussed. <br />he does not recall <br />Counci Imember Peterson said thav- she rad listened to the <br />tapes o£ the Council Meeting twice toda*: and ■‘.t no time did she <br />make the comment noted in the Petetsor's \etter. Peterson also <br />said that at no time did the Petersr./s mention replacing tne <br />fence. Peterson indicated that she "oo did not approve of the <br />fence being located in the right-of-va- because the Peterson's <br />neighbor to the north could come in and r^^quest the same. She <br />said allowing that to happen would create sight line pro>"Iems. <br />Mr. Peterson said that Mrs. Belt, to the south of them, has <br />a fence in the right-of-way. Mr. Petersen said there are many <br />fences in that area that are located ir the right-of-way. Ke <br />asked whether any size fence would be allowed within the right- <br />of-way? Mr. P*?terson said that he does not intend to declare any <br />rights to the ity's property by locating the fence there. <br />CounciImember Callahan asked Mr. Peterson if he had <br />discussed the installation of the pool with the City staff? <br />Mr. " -3rson said yes, quite a bit.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.