My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-23-1990 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1990
>
07-23-1990 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2024 2:17:32 PM
Creation date
11/19/2024 2:14:31 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
303
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Had the City of Orono better participated in the development <br />of this part of the Management Program, it would understand that <br />these points were considered by the participants, and rejected. <br />The determination was made to continue to keep the lake open to <br />all types of watercraft while significantly increasing patrol <br />hours, boater education, and other regulatory practices. <br />Page 2, paragraph 3. "The plan is misdirected in focusing on the <br />promotion of increased use of the lake and the establishment of <br />new access points and recreational land destinations for boaters <br />particularly as a first priority, and as a precondition for <br />future regulations." <br />RESPONSE; Again, nowhere in the Management Program do we <br />promote increased use of the lake. Orono is wrong. <br />The establishment of new access points is the result of the <br />policy established by the Metropolitan Access Committee, not the <br />LMCD or the Advisory Committee. Orono is as powerless to stop <br />that program being implemented as the LMCD is powerless. We <br />tried for at least three months to get two of the three member of <br />the Metropolitan Access Committee to change the policy for Lake <br />Minnetonka. They would not. If Orono believes it can accomplish <br />what we could not, we want you to contact Mr. Mike Markell, DNR <br />central office and Arne Stefferud, Metropolitan Council. Please <br />keep us advised of your progress. <br />Recreational land destinations are clearly within the <br />purview of the LMCD as long as they are on the shoreline of Lake <br />Minnetonka. <br />Again, it is unfortunate that Orono did not chose to better <br />participate in the preparation of the Management Program. We <br />would not be faced with these false and misdirected accusations. <br />Page 2, paragraph 3, a. "These matters have been the subject of <br />several previous reports as stated in the plan, and are the <br />special concern of other agencies, and are not part of the <br />mandate of the LMCD;" <br />RESPONSE: We are unaware of the reports referenced by the <br />City of Orono. Specifically, the concept of destinations is <br />unique to this Management Plan. If the City of Orono has such <br />references, we are keenly interested. Please provide us with a <br />copies. <br />Attached is a copy of the Laws of 1967, Chapter 907. The <br />LMCD clearly has jurisdiction over recreational use of Lake <br />Minnetonka. That is a responsibility shared by the DNR. The <br />LMCD is not subject to DNR review in these matters. <br />The law also clearly gives the ^CD authority over access <br />points. They may regulate them, police them and control their
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.