My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-23-1990 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1990
>
07-23-1990 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2024 2:17:32 PM
Creation date
11/19/2024 2:14:31 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
303
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
foster coordination, communication and cooperation beyond the <br />929.4 contour. We find the City of Orono's contention <br />misdirected. <br />The environmental controls included in the Draft Management <br />Program exceed those now in place and being implemented by the 14 <br />cities, the Watershed District, the Metropolitan Council, the DNR <br />and the PCA. The City of Orono's contention is unsupported and <br />erroneous. <br />The Management Program is not focused on promoting and <br />encouraging increased boat densities and additional access <br />points. Nowhere in the Management Program is increased boat <br />density encouraged. Exactly the opposite is true. The Draft <br />proposes a broad, comprehensive program for limiting growth. But <br />we do not attempt to stop further growth at this time. That is <br />the result of a conscious decision on the part of the Advisory <br />Committee and participants in plan formulation. <br />If the City of Orono seeks a policy of no further growth in <br />access, the City should formally convey that decision to the LMCD <br />and its Advisory Committee. We have received no such <br />communication. <br />The access standard of 700 car/trailer parking spaces is <br />that of the Metropolitan Access Committee. The member <br />organizations of that committee have established a standard for <br />access to metropolitan lakes, including Lake Minnetonka. They <br />have full statutory authority to implement that standard on Lake <br />Minnetonka, and indeed, have indicated their determination to do <br />so. This Management Program accepts that standard, only after <br />attempting to get two of the three members to accept a lower <br />standard. Those meetings were held over a six month period, in <br />open public forum. <br />It is absolutely untrue that the Management Program attempts <br />to remove land use regulation from local control. Nowhere in the <br />plan is there a call for a change in traditional authority and <br />power in this area. Right now, under Minnesota Statute, land use <br />controls are the shared responsibility of the local city, the <br />Watershed District, and the DNR. This Management Program merely <br />recognizes that shared responsibility and attempts to set a <br />consistent set of standards and criteria to be implemented by <br />those three organizations. The LMCD is to act to foster <br />coordination, cooperation, and communication. That is something <br />that has been missing far too often in the past. <br />We are guilty of seeking to raise taxes to pay for essential <br />regulatory and coordination activities. <br />We do not seek to dilute or eliminate and lessen local <br />control over the LMCD and surrender it to state agencies. Orono <br />cannot support that charge with any specific from the Management <br />Plan.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.