My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-09-1990 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1990
>
07-09-1990 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/18/2024 1:09:08 PM
Creation date
11/18/2024 1:05:01 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
550
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
“CTTYrr <br />; OF <br />ORGNO-i <br />CITYof ORONO <br />Post Office Box 66* Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 • Municipal Offices <br />On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka <br />June 25, 1990 <br />Blake Bichanich <br />332 Westlake Street <br />Long Lake, MN 55356 <br />Dear Mr. Bichanich: <br />You have requested some minor revisions to Resolution #2763, as <br />follows: <br />1.Revise language in Condition 4 to minimize the <br />oerceived impact and risk on the part of the Contract <br />for Deed holders. <br />2.Revise Condition 5 to not preclude a future City <br />Council from granting the necessary variances to allow <br />expansion of the residence on Lot 5 northward into Lot <br />4, ' possibly incorporating all or portions of the cabin <br />into the principal structure, once Lots 4 and 5 are <br />combined . <br />Having reviewed Condition 4 with City Administrator Mark <br />Eernhardson, it is our opinion that the current language is <br />reasonable given the intent of the Council in granting variances <br />based on your control of both lots. In fact, the last sentence <br />of Condition 4 could have been worded to preclude future separate <br />residential use of Lot 4 rather than sugges^^ing that the City <br />would merely "not be obligated" to allowing such a use. This is <br />a risk of which the current property owners must be aware. <br />Condition 5 could be reworded as follows: <br />5.The structure on Lot 4 shall remain merely as a <br />storage building, shall not be provided with <br />plumbing, and shall not serve as a second dwelling <br />unit on the property, except that this condition <br />does not preclude a future Council from granting <br />setback or other variances which might be <br />BUILDING 4 ZONING - 473-7357 <br />ASSESSING <br />ADMINISTRATION 4 RNANCE - 473-7358 <br />FAX-473-0510 <br />PUBLIC WORKS - 473-7359
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.