My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-09-1990 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
1990-1996 Microfilm
>
1990
>
07-09-1990 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/18/2024 1:09:08 PM
Creation date
11/18/2024 1:05:01 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
550
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
A RBSOLUTION GRANTING <br />A VARIANCE TO <br />MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE <br />SECTION 10.23, SUBDIVISION 5 (B) <br />FILE #1458 <br />WHEREAS, Blake Bichanich (hereinafter "the applicant") <br />is the owner of the properties located at 324-332 Westlake Street <br />within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally <br />described as follows: <br />Lots 4 & 5,Block 1, Hillside Park, Hennepin County, <br />Minnesota (hereinafter "the property");and <br />WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for a <br />variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.23, Subdivision 5 <br />(B)to permit the construction cf a second story addition above <br />the existing residence,located 13.0' from the south side lot <br />line and approximately 8' from the north side lot line of Lot 5 <br />where side setbacks of 30' are normally required. <br />NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED h\ tne City Council of <br />Orono, Minnesota: <br />FINDINGS <br />1.This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1458. <br />2.The property is located in the LR-IA Single Family <br />Rural Residential Zoning District. <br />3.The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application <br />on September 18, 1989, and recommended approval of the <br />proposed variance on a vote of 4-2 based upon the following <br />findings: <br />A)Applicant owns the adjacent Lot 4 to the north, <br />hence the effective side setback to the north lot line <br />is approximately 58'. The applicant has not combined <br />the two properties because they are on separate <br />contracts-for-deed. <br />B)The proposed second story addition and extension of <br />the existing house along the south line of existing <br />south wall, will encroach no closer to the neighboring <br />residence than the existing house, hence there is no <br />significant impact on the neighboring property. <br />Page 1 of 8
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.