My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-25-1990 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1990
>
06-25-1990 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/12/2024 12:21:35 PM
Creation date
11/12/2024 12:14:11 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
563
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Zoning File #1549 <br />June 15, 1990 <br />Page 3 <br />Options of Action <br />Denial - If denied please refer to the necessary findings in <br />the variance section of your zoning code. <br />Approval - If approved the following findings and hardships <br />may be considered; <br />1. The house was placed on property in 1968 prior to the <br />current regulations for the development of lakeshore <br />properties. <br />2. The original permit for house covered the lakeshore <br />deck. <br />3. There is no visual impact created by the screened <br />enclosure of the patio area because of the existing <br />topography and mature trees that surround the <br />residence. <br />4. Applicant is reducing hardcover within the 0-75' and <br />75-250' setback areas. <br />Staff has no recommendation for specific conditions except <br />to ask for hardcover removals as proposed by applicant. Planning <br />Commission may have others. <br />Review of Conditional Use Permit Application <br />The City staff and the County reviewed the request for a <br />loop driveway to facilitate safe access from this site. The <br />County approved the creation of a new curb cut at the east end <br />of the property finding that the steep topography of this <br />property presented a reasonable and acceptable hardship based on <br />the County's standards. Dave Zetterstrohm has contacted my <br />office to confirm the approval of the County. Unfortunately, the <br />staff has yet to receive written confirmation. <br />Staff has had an opportunity to convey early review comments <br />of Glenn Cook to the applicant and applicant has provided an <br />amended plan. Applicant's revised plans now show the retaining <br />wall in the west side yard with positive drainage being provided <br />within the 10' west of the retaining wall. Cook recommended that <br />the existing retaining wall that runs parallel to the loop road <br />within the street yard be increased in height approximately 9 to <br />10'. At this height the slopes can be retained at 6:1 ratio. <br />The side slopes at the east side must be increased to a 3;1 ratio <br />and swale must be totally located out of east neighbors property. <br />The City will require fencing at the top of this retaining wall.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.