My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-25-1990 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1990
>
06-25-1990 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/12/2024 12:21:35 PM
Creation date
11/12/2024 12:14:11 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
563
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Zoning File #1473 <br />January 9, 1990 <br />Page 2 of 4 <br />Section 10.25, Subdivision 6 (B) <br />required for current deck. <br />- Side setback variance <br />Required <br />Proposed <br />Variance <br />10 <br />9' <br />1'or 10% <br />Review of After-the-fact Application - <br />On September 6, 1989 a Stop Work Order was issued for <br />renovation and remodeling work within the interior of the home <br />and deck addition being done without a building permit. On that <br />same day a permit was issued for the renovation and remodeling <br />work within the interior of the house. All work on the deck <br />would have to cease until hardcover facts were submitted and an <br />updated survey. <br />On September 15, 1989 the contractor submitted hardcover <br />calculations and an updated survey. The contractor was advised <br />of the need for an average lakeshore setback variance and <br />hardcover variances. At that time it should be noted that the <br />partial deck structure had not encroached the 0-75' setback area. <br />On September 19, 1989 a citation was issued because work was <br />continued on the deck. Additional foundation posts were <br />installed. On November 9th the 'Zoning staff conducted the <br />customary on site inspection of the property as part of the <br />variance application procedure. Staff found the deck completed <br />except for required railings. Staff advised the City Attorney of <br />the current status of the deck and requested that he send a <br />letter to the applicant's attorney advising of the continuing <br />violation. The City Attorney's office has advised the the <br />owner's associate, James Michael Klein, has pleaded not guilty to <br />the citation. A court date has not been scheduled as of this <br />writing. The City Attorney has advised the City to continue with <br />the variance review as the courts will be awaiting the City's <br />final action on the variance application.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.