My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-25-1990 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1990
>
06-25-1990 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/12/2024 12:21:35 PM
Creation date
11/12/2024 12:14:11 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
563
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
minutes op the planning commission meeting JANUARY 16, 1990 <br />ZONING PILE(p.473-KELLy CONTINUED <br />regulations. <br />Mr. Bear said that the house has four 8' sliding glass doors <br />in that location and he could not have them opening onto nothing. <br />Mr. Bear added that the applicants have talked with the <br />neighboring property owners and they approve of the deck. <br />Mr. Klien indicated that the site lines were cut down <br />because the old deck had more of a "boxy" appearance and did not <br />tier down the hill. Mr. Klien said that the railing on the old <br />deck was thick wood. <br />Kelley observed that the new deck does not have railings, <br />which he added are needed, and it is difficult to tell what the <br />site lines will be once they are installed. <br />Mr. Klien informed the Planning Commission that he is <br />proposing tubular railings rather than wood railings. <br />There were no comments from the public regarding this matter <br />and the public hearing was closed. <br />Kelley said, "We have been pretty consistent on decks, <br />hardcover and hardships in Orono. From my point of view, you can <br />replace what was there and stay within the ordinance. The <br />increase in the 0-75' setback zone, even if it's minimal, is <br />objectionable in my opinion, as I have been a strong supporter or <br />maintaining the lakeshore protective area. In regard to the 75- <br />250' zone, if you can delete other parts of the hardcover on the <br />property within that zone to bring hardcover back to 5*7.2%, I <br />don't have any problem with that. As to the average lakeshore <br />setback, I think we have to stay within what we were before. We <br />have, however, in the past dealt with grade level decks a little <br />differently. However, this does not classify as a grade level <br />deck." Kelley advised the applicants that the deck would have to <br />be brought back to the site lines that existed with the previous <br />deck. <br />It was moved by Kelley, seconded by Moos, to recommend <br />denial of ti.e average lakeshore setback variance of 19 to 20 , <br />the variances to increase hardcover in the 0-75 and 75 25 <br />setback areas, as well as the sideyard setback <br />said that he would approve what pre-existed. <br />could be done in the interim period to <br />situation safe. Cohen said that the deck should be removed. <br />Motion, Ayes-5, Nays-0, Motion passed. <br />• 1475 JOHN MCDOMELL <br />4045, 4105 C 4135 BAYSIDB ROAD <br />PRBLIMIHARy SOBDIVISIOM ,n i, m <br />CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING 8:25 P.M. TO 8:40 P.N. <br />Mr. McDowell was present for this public hearing, as was Mr. <br />Thomas Owens, the Attorney for Robert white.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.