My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-25-1990 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1990
>
06-25-1990 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/12/2024 12:21:35 PM
Creation date
11/12/2024 12:14:11 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
563
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ORONO REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING HELD JUNE 11, 1990 <br />ZONING FILE #1513-KRAHL CONTINUED <br />meeting. He stated that there is less structure on the property <br />than proposed with plan 2 for which the Planning Commission <br />recommended approval. <br />Kelley indicated that in light of Mr. Krahl's explanation, <br />he did not feel it necessary for Planning Commission to review <br />the revision. <br />It was moved by Councilmember Nettles, seconded by <br />Councilmember Goetten, to adopt Resolution #2813, approving the <br />hardcover and street setback variances as proposed with Council <br />option #2 of the memo. Mr. Krahl asked which plan had been <br />approved. Mayor Grabek stated that option #2 had been approved. <br />Gaffron clarified that option #2 is to approve plan #3 per the <br />attached resolution. Motion, Ayes-5, Nays-0. Motion passed. <br />#1524 TRINITY PRE-SCHOOL <br />2060 SIXTH AVENUE NORTH <br />CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT <br />RESOLUTION #2814 <br />Ms. Wesley Hallquist was present. <br />Bernhardson reviewed the information regarding this <br />application, noting that fencing of the property was the major <br />issue (see Jeanne Mabusth's memo dated May 17, 1990). <br />Ms. Hallquist explained that the issue of fencing caught her <br />off-guard at the Planning Commission meeting. She stated that <br />she has been the director of several pre-shool programs and <br />fencing was not required for any of them. She said that neither <br />the State nor the City require fencing. Ms. Hallquist said that <br />there is currently no outdoor play equipment, but she would still <br />like to take the children outdoors for supervised play <br />activities. She said that the location of the property lends <br />itself v/ell to providing a play area without the need for a <br />fence, especially in light of its proximity to the road. <br />Mayor Grabek stated that he had mixed feelings. He said <br />that the City should do whatever necessary to provide for the <br />safety of the children, rather than leaving it entirely up to the <br />watchful eye of the director. However, due to the location of <br />the property and the fact that the State has no fencing <br />regulations, the City should not require fencing in this case. <br />Councilmember Goetten concurred with Mayor Grabek. <br />Councilmember Callahan asked Ms. Hallquist how many <br />supervisors there will be when the children are outdoors. <br />Ms. Hallquist replied that State law requires that she have <br />1 adult for every 10 children. However, she intends to have 2 <br />- 12 -
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.