My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-25-1990 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1990
>
06-25-1990 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/12/2024 12:21:35 PM
Creation date
11/12/2024 12:14:11 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
563
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
'(1) has not been indemnified by another organization <br />or employee benefit plan for the same Judgments, <br />penalties, fines, including, without limitation,' excise <br />taxes assessed against the person with respect to an <br />employee benefit plan, settlements, and reasonable • ^ <br />expenses, including attorneys' fees and disbursements, <br />incurred by the person In connection with the proceeding <br />with respect to the same acts or omissions; <br />(2) acted In good faith; <br />(3) received no improper personal benefit; <br />(4) in the case of a criminal proceeding, had no <br />reasonable cause to believe the conduct was unlawful; and <br />(5) in the case of acts or emissions occurring in the <br />official capacity described in Section 1, paragraph (c), <br />clause <1) or (2) of this Artic'e, reasonably believed <br />that the conduct was in the best Interests of the <br />corporation, or in the case of acts of emissions oecurring <br />in the official capacity described in Section 1, paragraph <br />(c), clause (3), reasonably believed that the conduct was <br />not opposed to the best interests of the corporation. If <br />the person's acts or omissions complained of in the <br />proceeding relate to conduct as a director, officer, <br />trustee, employee or agent of an emi loyee benefit plan, <br />the conduct Is not considered to be opposed to the best <br />interests of the corporation if the person reasonably <br />believed that the conduct was in the best interests of the <br />participants or beneficiaries of the employee benefit <br />plan. • <br />b. The termination of a proceeding by judgment, order, <br />settlement, conviction, or upon a plea of nolo contendere cr <br />its equivalent does not, of Itself, establish that the person <br />did not meet the criteria set forth in this Section 2. <br />Section 3. Advances. Subject to the provisions of Section 4 <br />of this Article, If a person Is made or threatened to be made a party to <br />a proceeding, the person is entitled, upon written request to the <br />corporation, to payment or reimbursement by the corporation of <br />reasonable expenses, including attorneys' fees and <br />disbursements,Incurred by the person in advance of the final disposition <br />of the proceeding,'(a) upon receipt by the corporation of a written <br />affirmation by the person of a good faith belief that'thecriterla for <br />Indemnification :set .'forth In Section 2 of this 'Article, have;been <br />satisfied and:a'written undertaking by the person to^repay^al Hamounts <br />so paid or reimbursed by the'corporation. If it 'I®. <br />that the criteria-for indemnification have not been sati3fied,uand.._£^J _ .^ ,t_,_...__ <br />after a detennlnatlon that the if acts-then* known-to'those-making Ithe .u ' <br />Jeterralnatlon would not preclude indemnification under this-Article. <br />•T-- <br />■: : ■:. <br />: .-r. --i; <br />; “-r. <br />•••■!-
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.