My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-25-1990 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1990
>
06-25-1990 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/12/2024 12:21:35 PM
Creation date
11/12/2024 12:14:11 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
563
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
SArtlon U. SubD. 2. Impervious surface coverage of <br />^^- - - should not exceed 25 percent of the lot <br />area without an approved storm water management plan. <br />Storm water management plan to be used for residential and <br />commercial properties. The current Wayzata Ordinance only allows <br />a storm water management plan to be usea for commercial <br />properties exceeding 30% lot coverage. <br />Section Y. Implicit in the Standards and Criteria: <br />All other sub-parts and subdivisions not specifically mentioned <br />(in the LMCD Plan) are implicit to the standard and criteria <br />contained in Appendix C. These include, but are not limited to: <br />6120.3300 Subp. 2. Residential lot size . , , . , <br />6120.3300 Subp. 2a. Lot area and width standards for single, <br />duplex, triplex, and quad residential <br />development, lake classes <br />6120.3300 Subp. 3&4 Other parts not listed in LMCD Plan <br />6120-3300 Subp. 10. Commercial, industrial, public and <br />semi-public standards <br />Comment! Section 6120-3300, Subp. 10 of the DNR regulations <br />states that commercial development with water^oriented needs may <br />be located on riparian lots provided certain criteria are <br />However, commercial uses not in need of lake access may not be <br />located on a riparian parcel unless the setback requirements are <br />doubled and the use is substantially screened from view of the <br />lake either by topography or vegetation. <br />This would present substantial obstacles if any of the riparian <br />oarcels in the CBD were to experience redevelopment. in <br />virtually every case from the Minnetonka Boat Works <br />Village Shops, doubling the 50 foot OHWL setback would not be <br />possible due to the narrow depths of these lots. This would <br />require the City and the LMCD to either issue a host of variances <br />or prohibit further redevelopment of the downtown. Neither one <br />of these are viable solutions and the setback ^nd screening <br />requirements stated above are not reasonable standards for <br />downtown Wayzata. <br />Deleted Provision. A final concern with regardsto the appendix <br />- - - - - - - - - - - - -C rea»»lations of the LMCD Plan is that the <br />Plan intentionally omits a provision within the new DNR <br />regulations. This is Section 6120.2800, Subp. 3., <br />Flexibility. This provision of the DNR regulations is to alio <br />local governments, under special thatCommission’s approval, adopt shoreland management controls that <br />8
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.