Laserfiche WebLink
LOSING LAKES: Enjoyment of a Unique Metropolitan Resource is Threatened 7 <br />Surface use ordinances are believed to help reduce user conflicts on many lakes in the seven-county <br />area. The restrictions on motorized boats on Minneapolis and St. Paul lakes (Calhoun, Como, etc.) arc <br />frequently praised as examples of good management practices appropriate to their urban settings. <br />Outside of the central cities. Lake Johanna has been cited as an example of a lake where zoning by time <br />of day and common direction of travel nilcs have been used cffcctivdy. <br />Effectiveness of surface use restrictions is limited because lake users are often unaware of the <br />regulations. In a 1984 DNR survey, only about half of the boaters interviewed on metropolitan lakes <br />with surface use restrictions knew about them.'' Boaters entering from public, private, and riparian <br />accesses were equally unaware of the restrictions. Ignorance of surface use restrictions has been found <br />to be a contributing factor to boating accidents on Lake Minnetonka. <br />CONCLUSIONS <br />Without changes in the present system of surface use management, conflicts and safety problems on <br />metro lakes will increase along with user density. While severe crowding and safety problems are <br />relatively rare at present, we strongly believe that pressures on the lakes will increase. More and more <br />people have the time for recreation and the income to indulge themselves in expensive watercraft. <br />Boating densities on many area lakes continues to increase. Planning agencies, such as the <br />Metropolitan Council, stress the need for more recreational facilities to accommodate members of the <br />"baby-boom" generation and their families. In particular, the popularity of boating and fishing is <br />expected to grow as the baby-boomers age. <br />A few user groups are increasingly being pushed onto less preferred lakes. While little information is <br />available on the phenomenon of user displacement, managers seem to depend heavily on displacement <br />to regulate levels of lake use. This leads to a pecking order of lake user groups. Left unrestricted, <br />powerboaters and water-skiers effectively control the surface of a lake because other user groups can be <br />displaced by them. <br />Some uses are intq)propriate for certain lakes. Activities like powerboating and water-skiing can disturb <br />lake sediments and wildlife. They are obviously inappropriate for natural environment and shallow <br />lakes. They may also be undesirable in densely-populated areas where they can bother other lake users <br />and riparians. <br />Regulation of surface use must be consistent with the planning and management of lake use. <br />Regulations aimed at maintaining natural conditions would be difficult to enforce if access, shoreland <br />facilities, and channel dredging favor large, fast powerboats Likewise, intensive fish-stocking on a <br />lake managed for water-skiing and jet skis will tend to increase conflict ^2 <br />RECOMMENDATIONS <br />We recommend; <br />â–¡Surface use on metropolitan lakes should be managed and regulated <br />with the following goals in mind: <br />minimizing conflicts among lake users; <br />ensuring safe enjoyment of the lakes; <br />11 <br />12 <br />Baistad and Karasov. <br />Noic that it would be possible and perhaps desirable to stock a wa*er-skiing lake with fish even if <br />fishing was limited to the spring and fall months when few peopL water skL