My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-11-1990 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1990
>
06-11-1990 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/5/2024 11:28:43 AM
Creation date
11/5/2024 11:25:56 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
380
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
a-Page TwoMay25,1990 <br />on the lot.We question the granting of the side setback variances <br />without more specific building and foundation plans, particularly <br />since the proposed house could not be built with those setbacks. <br />(c)The Planning Commission indicated that the City of Orono <br />would take over the existing drainage ditch near the Jentilucci lot <br />line and that the City of Orono would assume liability for <br />maintenance of that ditch and for its adequacy. My clients remain <br />concerned that the existing drainage system is not adequate to handle <br />heavy rainfalls or snow melt. For the past several years we have <br />been in somewhat of a drought situation but this cannot continue. We <br />appreciate the City of Orono assuming responsibility for the system <br />and its adequacy, but do not really want to get into a situation <br />where drainage problems occur and we are forced to go back against <br />the City of Orono for compensation for damages to the Jentilucci <br />property. We believe that the existing system could be modified to <br />better handle drainage of v;ater.But, that would appear to require <br />changing the slope and drainage of the property to the west (Dayton <br />property), creating a slope or otherwise making necessary changes in <br />elevation so that the water would flow off the Jentilucci property <br />over the Dayton property. This would appear to be one solution. We <br />would ask that the City Council have its engineer meet with Mr. and <br />Mrs. Jentilucci to discuss what changes in the drainage system are <br />needed. If agreement can be reached on the drainage, Mr. and Mrs. <br />Jentilucc-i are willing to grant an easement to the City for <br />maintenance of the ditch along their property, it being suggested <br />that the easement be 10 feet on either side of the drain tile. <br />If agreement can be reached with respect to the drainage situation^ <br />my clients’ concerns will be lessened with respect to building on t.ie <br />Hilbelink property. But, any variances granted to Mr. Hilbelink <br />should include provisions which require any changes of elevation in <br />the lot to be approved by the Planning Commission end City Council, <br />and should be in such a form as to appear on record title, e.g. a <br />covenant, so that any future owners are aware of this requirement. <br />We would respectfully request that the City Council not approve <br />the variance to construct the residence on the Hilbelink property <br />until and unless the concerns outlined in this letter have been <br />reasonably satisfied.Please advise us of the date and time the <br />City Council will be considering the Hilbelink matter.I would <br />ask that I be given mailed notice of any action planned as to <br />that property.Again, I urge your city engineer to meet with Mr. and <br />Mrs. Jentilucci to see if a reasonable remedy is available.Thank <br />you for your consideration. <br />Sincerely yours, <br />NEIL D. HEIKKILA d ASSOCIATES, LTD. <br />NDH:dlk <br />cc:Mr. and Mrs. Alex J. Jentilucci
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.