Laserfiche WebLink
J <br />Issue #1.NSP <br />1.Accept franchise ordinance as presented. <br />2.Alter the length from the proposed 20 year term. <br />3.Direct the staff to further research underground <br />replacement of lines. <br />4.Table for further discussion. <br />Issue #2.Wriqht/Hennepin <br />1.Conclude the public hearing. <br />2.Continue the public hearing. <br />3.Determine if any of the changes proposed by <br />Wright Hennepin are acceptable. <br />4.Issues listed under NSP. <br />Issue #3.Territorial <br />Please refer to Attachment C. <br />RECOMMENDATION <br />Issue #1 - It is recommended that the Suburban Rate Authority <br />franchise be adopted as the franchise for NSP for 10 years. The <br />limited time period is recommended due to the changing nature of <br />technology generally. <br />Issue #2 - It is recommended that following closure of the public <br />hearirigT the Wright Hennepin franchise be adopted as the basic <br />franchise for the seune period as NSP. <br />PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by _,seconded by _,that Council adopt <br />franchise ordinance I___ as a franchise ordinance with Northern <br />States Power Company and that they adopt ordinance #__ as the <br />franchise ordinance for Wright Hennepin Electric Cooperative. <br />Ayes __, Nays __. <br />cc:Marlowe Peterson, NSP - Minnetonka/Excelsior <br />Wright Hennepin