Laserfiche WebLink
^ a»S2 <br />residential was done in order to limit curb cuts and traffic <br />generation on 15 that was anticipated if * <br />(This was a typical strategy of the Council at the time.) in <br />light of this the Council may consider: <br />A. Resoning of the property although this may have an <br />imoact on the type of development that comes to the <br />™rty bet«.n"lotB and Bayahlt. lot. vhlch were <br />Expected to be some type of lo. to moderate residential <br />density. <br />B. Leave as is. <br />It would be staffs position that there <br />reulstratlon and awareness of these types of proposals and <br />current ordinance doesn ’t requite such, then It »® *"*"^*^* <br />This does not mean that the City should be • PO»‘ <br />discouraqe such activity. Whether it Is regulated “"“J*' <br />ordinance or not It doe. ..ot prevent Mr. Penke’s type of business <br />from being licensed '5> the County. <br />The issue of Mi. Penke's continued business on ^he site needs to <br />be addressed. Because of the fact that the <br />and Mr. Penke has been doing business on this site for thr <br />years, it may be appropriate that the Council action to continue <br />it for at least 60 days pending the possible rezoning of tha <br />property. <br />ALTE^ATI^VES - <br />Issue 1. Ordinance RegulaUon <br />1. Acceptance of Information from Ihe City Attorney on <br />ordinance interpretation. <br />2. Discuss what action the Council may want to take in <br />relationship to the existing ordinance. <br />3. Direct staff to amend ordinance to govern peddlers <br />and transient merchants. <br />4. Choose not to regulate, leaving regulation to <br />County. <br />5. Table. <br />Issue 2. Rezo ning <br />1. Accept the information <br />2. Table for further consideration <br />3. Give a preliminary indication to the owner as to <br />whether It is fruitful to undertake a rezoning or not