My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1991-03-11 Resolution #2934
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
C
>
Casco Point Road
>
2665 Casco Point Road - 20-117-23-23-0021
>
Resolutions
>
1991-03-11 Resolution #2934
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/31/2024 3:12:58 PM
Creation date
10/31/2024 3:12:33 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
o o <br />' ‘ A \\ <br />' ii‘> t\>'A. <br />CITYof ORONO <br />RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br />NO. 2934_ _ _ _ _ <br />FIBDIIIGS <br />1. These applications were reviewed as Zoning Files #1493 and <br />#1570. <br />2. The property is located in the LR-IC Single Family Lakeshore <br />Residential Zoning District requiring 21»780 s.f. or 1/2 acre in <br />The property consists of 12^850 s#fe or .29 seres* <br />3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed these applications on <br />February 20, 1990, March 19, 1990, August 20, 1990 and January <br />22, 1991 and recommended approval of the proposed variances and <br />conditional use permit based upon the following findings; <br />Hardcover variances <br />a. Excessive hardcover resulted from landscaped areas <br />underlain with plastic that was not considered hardcover at <br />the time a 1982 survey was completed. <br />b. Applicant was advised in an earlier 1982 variance <br />review to maintain gravel drive area to assist in backout <br />maneuvering from garage. <br />c. Hardcover will be reduced 66.3 s.f. or 1.47% <br />75' setback area and 1,022.3 s.f. or 12.3% in the 75 —250 <br />setback area. <br />After-the-fact average lakeshore setback variance....................... <br />a. Current neighbors on adjacent properties had submitted <br />letters noting no problem with location of second story <br />existing lakeshore deck. <br />b. Second story deck provides no visual impact or <br />interference with lakeshore views for residences on either <br />side because of sloping lakeshore topographies. <br />Page 2 of 6
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.