Laserfiche WebLink
,LO.tO CITY OF ORONO <br /> RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> NO. 7521 <br /> 4kESHOw' <br /> WHEREAS, on October 14, 2024, the City Council reviewed the application and the <br /> recommendations of the Planning Commission and City staff; and <br /> WHEREAS, on October 14, 2024, the City Council voted 5 to 0 to approve the requested <br /> hardcover variance conditioned upon the addition of a required driveway turnaround under City <br /> Code Section 78-1681 and directed staff to prepare findings for approval of the hardcover <br /> variances.; and <br /> WHEREAS, on October 14, 2024, the City Council voted 5 to 0 to deny the requested <br /> setback variances and directed staff to prepare findings for denial of the setback variances. <br /> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Orono, Minnesota <br /> hereby approves the requested variance allowing 27.7% hardcover on the property conditioned <br /> upon the addition of a required driveway turnaround; and denies the requested setback <br /> variances as described above based on one or more of the following findings of fact concerning <br /> the Property: <br /> FINDINGS OF FACT: <br /> Al. The analysis contained within staff memos and the exhibits attached to the aforesaid <br /> memos, all minutes from the above-mentioned meetings, and any other materials <br /> distributed at these meetings are hereby incorporated by reference. <br /> A2. The Property is located in the LR-1C One Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District. <br /> A3. The Property contains 0.25 acres in area and has a defined lot width of 64 feet. <br /> A4. The Property is within Tier 1 and hardcover is limited to 25% according to the <br /> Stormwater Quality Overlay District. <br /> A5. The Applicant has applied for the following variances: <br /> a. Hardcover Variance <br /> b. Side Yard Setback Variance <br /> c. Lake Setback Variance <br /> d. Average Lakeshore Setback Variance <br /> A6. In considering this application for variances, the Council has considered the advice and <br /> recommendation of the Planning Commission and the effect of the proposed variance <br /> upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic <br /> 2 <br />