Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD MAY 14, 1990 <br />ZONING FILE #1515-JOHNSON CONTINUED <br />in other areas of the lake, but did not know the specific number <br />of properties at this time. She recollected that Council had <br />approved a similar application for a property on Tonkawa Road <br />just last year. <br />It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmem er <br />Nettles, to grant approval of the variances requested by Jeffrey <br />Johnson to construct a walkway. Goetten did not approve of the <br />configuration and length of the walkway for the purpose of <br />providing lakeshore access. She said that she had opposed the <br />application for Tonkawa Road for that same purpose. Goetten had <br />concerns about public safety and thought that this type of <br />structure is inappropriate. Mr. Johnson agreed that the <br />configuration is not ideal, but it makes use of the lakeshore <br />property which is otherwise unbuildable. Goetten was concerned <br />about the precedent being •'et by approving these structures. <br />Callahan expressed concern about the walkway crossing wetland <br />area. Johnson did nor believe that this opportunity would be <br />available to a large number of property owners. Goetten asked <br />Johnson what hardship exists. Johnson replied that the hardship <br />is the inability to access the lakeshore property. Mayor Grabek <br />again asked if something could be arranged with the adjacent <br />property owner. Johnson stated that his attempts to do so had <br />failed. He added that it will be necessary for his neighbor to <br />obtain Council approval for his existing walkway. Public Works <br />Director Gerhardson noted that the neighbor did not obtain a <br />permit from the City to cross the right-of-way. Mayor Grabek <br />stated that it will be necessary for the City to resolve that <br />situation. Councilmember Nettles asked what purpose would be <br />served by preserving the right-of-way. Bernhardson replied that <br />the land would revert back to the adjoining property owner if the <br />easement were vacated and would hinder Mr. Johnson's efforts. He <br />believed that it would be necessary to obtain DNR approval to <br />vacate the easement. He added that the City has maintained a <br />number of these right-of-ways for potential future accesses. <br />Goetten asked whether crossing the right-of-way creates any <br />liability on behalf of the City. Gerhardson said that it would <br />be necessary to have Mr. Johnson enter into a Hold Harmless <br />Agreement as well as an agreement to remove the structure should <br />the City require use of the right-of-way. Gerhardson did not <br />believe that the City could enter in those agreements with the <br />owner of the existing walkway. Motion, Ayes-2, Callahan, Goetten <br />and Peterson, Nay. Motion failed. <br />It was moved by Councilmember Callahan, seconded by <br />Councilmember Peterson, to table this item until the May 29, 1990 <br />Council Meeting. Staff is directed to contact the property owner <br />with the existing walkway to explore the option of combining use. <br />Motion, Ayes-4, Goetten, Nay. Motion passed. <br />- 11 -