05-29-1990 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Zoning File #1516 April 13, 1990 Page 5 of 7 staff has advised the applicants that easements would not be requested for the wetlands or pond area within the outlets, and that those easements would be requested when future development occurs. The Citv will require granting of a flowage and conservation easement over the wetlands in Lot 1, Block 1 abutting Fox Street. Discussion of an easement for the smaller pond within Lot Block 1 will be found in application #1517, the conditional use permit for work in that non-designated pond area. E. Disposition of Existing Structures A number of buildings and structures on the property apparently are intended to be removed as a result of this replat. In proposed Lot 1, Block 1, the existing residence, which will have a new lot line bisectijigit, is apparently intended for , removal tot illy. That lot wil'l'^tl^l contain a tennis court that is shown to be approximately 12' fi?om the northerly lot This is one of the few lot lines^tfiat has previously existed and is not changing, hence Planning Commission could justify not requiring that line to move due to its pre-existing status. Other options would be to require 30' setback for the tennis court, o^r alternatively Planning Commission could request a 50 setback if it is determined that the adjacent lot line is a "rear" lot 3 ine. tT'*^/'Jfc' In Lot 2, Block 1, there are two detached gara-.es and a caretaker residence which staff presumes will be removed. Applicants should confirm that this is the case. exists. Lot 1, Block 2 has no detached accessory structures. There are also no apparent structures on either of the two future development outlets. Applicants should be requested to provide a schedule for removal of the accessory buildings that are to be removed, and such a schedule should be incorporated into the preliminary and final plat approval resolutions. ^-/rr ■' I^’IO