My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1986-01-13 Resolution #1094 Pg1
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
C
>
Casco Circle
>
3237 Casco Circle - 20-117-23-43-0013
>
Resolutions
>
1986-01-13 Resolution #1094 Pg1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/24/2024 2:50:46 PM
Creation date
10/24/2024 2:48:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
x Address Old
House Number
3237
Street Name
Casco
Street Type
Circle
Address
3237 Casco Circle
PIN
2011723430013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
.. c <br />I <br />W; ■V.h;;! <br />City of ORONO <br />RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br />NO. 1904 <br />6. Upon completion of a 6 month City wide review of the common <br />ownership issue, on December 19, 1983, the City approved a pro- <br />posed amendment of the municipal code that would permit all <br />substandard undeveloped lots within the sewered areas of the Citv <br />ownership of these lots, the same standards for <br />square feet or 77% of the required <br />lott* consistent in area with 7 other developedlots within a total developed neighborhood of 33 lots. <br />8. The property measures 55 feet in lot width and is approxi- <br />^ narrowest lots in the 33 lot^CascoCircle neighborhood at 60 feet. <br />9. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on <br />aonrovAi ® majority of its members recommended <br />find:Tr^*^ variances as proposed based upon the following <br />A) No available land - lots are developed on both sides of property. <br />B) The property is served with sewer and water. <br />C) A house and improvements can be constructed without the <br />need for additional variances. <br />D) By granting this variance there will be no negative <br />effect on the public health, safety and welfare. <br />E) By granting this variance it is consistent with the <br />development of the area. <br />P) By granting this variance there should be no need for <br />future hardcover and setback variances. <br />G) The special conditions applying to the parcel of land in <br />question are peculiar to such property or immediately ad <br />joining property. <br />Page 2 of 6
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.