My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-21-2024 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2024
>
10-21-2024 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/22/2024 11:37:45 AM
Creation date
10/22/2024 11:32:38 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
232
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
FILE # LA24-000053 <br />21 October 2024 <br />Page 3 of 5 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Applicable Regulations: <br />Lot Width Variance (Section 78-350) <br />Zoning Code Section 78-72(c)(2) provides options for the redevelopment of lots that do not meet the minimum <br />area or width requirements for the respective zoning district. Substandard properties within the Shoreland <br />Overlay District, such as the subject lot, can be redeveloped without variances if specific standards are met, <br />such as: <br />1. All setback requirements can be met; <br />2. A Type 1 sewage treatment system consistent with Minnesota Rules, chapter 7080, can be installed or <br />the lot is connected to a public sewer; and <br />3. The impervious surface coverage meets all hardcover location and square footage restrictions of this <br />chapter and the total square footage of hardcover does not exceed 25 percent of the entire lot area. <br />4. All other zoning district standards can be met. <br /> <br />The property area is 0.44 acre where 1.0 acre is required and width is 140 feet at the lake and 130 feet wide at <br />the 75-foot setback. The applicant’s request for variances results in the property’s inability to conform to all of <br />the standards above. Therefore, lot area and lot width variances are also required to redevelop the property. <br />The ability to develop the property consistent with other existing developed properties in the neighborhood <br />would be limited if the area variance is not granted. <br /> <br />75-foot Lake Setback Variances (Section 78-1279) <br />The buildable area of the property is reduced by the 75-foot setback and sanitary sewer line/easement on the <br />property. The applicant is proposing to build a new home on the existing footprint as they find this to be the <br />most suitable location to build due to the site constraints. They are expanding the footprint on the north and <br />south sides to take advantage of the width of the property but to increase square footage are proposing a 2nd <br />story over the majority of the footprint resulting in massing expansions in the 75-foot setback. The proposed <br />deck, not depicted on the 3D rendering, is proposed to encroach 1.5 feet closer to the lake than the existing <br />footprint. The expansion areas are shown on the 3D rendering attached as Exhibit H. <br /> <br />75-foot Hardcover Variance (Section 78-1279; 78-1680; and 78-1700) <br />The applicant is proposing a 346-square-foot reduction in the hardcover within the 75-foot setback. Although <br />the 2nd story of the new home increases the mass within the 75-foot setback, it does not result in more <br />hardcover. Rather the redevelopment removes an enclosed porch from the lakeside of the home and replaces <br />it with an open deck 1.5 feet closer to the lake than the existing porch. The enclosed porch is relocated to the <br />north end of the home within conforming setbacks. <br /> <br />Governing Regulation: Variance (Section 78-123) <br />In reviewing applications for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the proposed <br />variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light <br />and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. The <br />Planning Commission shall consider recommending approval for variances from the literal provisions of the <br />Zoning Code in instances where their strict enforcement would cause practical difficulties because of <br />circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration and shall recommend approval only when <br />it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Orono Zoning Code. <br />Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties also include but are <br />not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for <br />earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. §216C.06, subd. 14, when in harmony with this chapter. <br />The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under this chapter for <br />property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. The board or council may permit as a variance <br />60
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.