My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-21-2024 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2024
>
10-21-2024 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/22/2024 11:37:45 AM
Creation date
10/22/2024 11:32:38 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
232
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
FILE #LA24-000054 <br />October 21, 2024 <br />Page 3 of 5 <br />Stormwater <br />Overlay <br />District Tier <br />Total Area <br />in Tier <br />Allowed <br />Hardcover <br />Existing <br />Hardcover Proposed Hardcover <br />Tier 5 212,572 s.f 180,686.2 s.f. <br />(85 %)Vacant 159,909 s.f. <br />(75 %) <br />Site Plan Review: <br />Building height. The industrial district allows for a 40’ defined height. <br />The lot is relative flat. Most of the lot sits at 1025 elevation grade. The proposed first floor <br />elevations of the building ranges from 1024.7 to 1026.6. The site overall will maintain a similar <br />grade to the existing lot. The buildings are proposed to be 33.5’ peak height from the first floor <br />elevation to the top of the gable. With the minimal grading required for the site, staff anticipates <br />the defined height (Grade to the midpoint of a gabled roof) to be roughly 25’ in height. <br />Long Facades: Where large structures with overly-long facades (walls) are proposed, such as <br />warehouses, building mass should be articulated with variations in the building plane and parapet <br />height and through the use of other unique design or site plan features. <br />The applicant has proposed some roof gables to break up and create interest along the roofline. <br />To windows or wall breaks are proposed. The planning commission should discuss the long <br />building that faced Old Crystal Bay Rd and provide feedback on façade that is public facing. <br />Architectural design:Architectural design should create harmony through the use of different <br />textures, complementary colors, shadow lines and contrasting shapes. The use of walls in a single <br />color, with little detailing or completely blank is discouraged. This submitted proposal shows a mix <br />of material including stone, stucco, siding and shingles. The colors are charcoal grey/brown with <br />a light stone accent and a black roof. <br />Materials:Use of substantial amounts of high quality masonry materials (face brick, stucco, stone) <br />is encouraged. Buildings shall be constructed with no less than 67 percent of these materials, <br />excluding window and door areas. Evaluation of building materials shall be based on the quality of <br />its design and relationship and compatibility to building materials in the immediate neighborhood. <br />The applicant is proposing each building to use brick and stucco in combination to meet the 67% <br />requirement. The remating percentage will be made up of hardy board siding finished in a similar <br />color to match the exterior. <br />Parking. The application is not proposing any outdoor parking. The drive aisles will be fully <br />screened from the public street view. The City Code does not list a parking standardthat considered <br />the proposed use. Staff has referenced the following for a parking standard: <br />Multi-tenant industrial buildings: One space for each 400 square feet of gross floor area, or the <br />sum of the component gross floor areas as follows, whichever is greater. <br />Following the reference city code for warehouse space. A total of 235 space for warehouse should <br />be provided. Each unit would support 2-4 enclosed parking spaces meeting. 30 units would <br />support 4 cars (120 spaces) and 55 units would support 2 parking spaces (110 spaces) resulting in <br />a total of 230 indoor spaces for the site. <br />There is not a specific use identified for garage condos within the City Code as this time. The <br />applicant is not proposing and open parking spaces for customer use. It is anticipated in the <br />business model that each individual unit will be used to parking for the owner. Additional <br />testimony from the applicant should be provided regarding their plans for parking on the site. <br />147
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.