Laserfiche WebLink
Lot Ar<?a: <br />Hardcover: <br />0 <br />75 <br />250 <br />Existing <br />75* <br />250* <br />500* <br />25,925 sq. ft, <br />62,900 sq. ft <br />40,000 sq. ft, <br />128,825 sq. ft <br />Allowed <br />■ 2.96 AC <br />Sq.Ft. %Sq.Ft. % <br />0 - 75* <br />75 - 250* <br />250 - 500* <br />Total <br />1,491 ( 5.75%) <br />11,450 (18.2 %) <br />2,500 ( 6.3 %) <br />0 ( 0 <br />15,725 (25 <br />12,000 (30 <br />%) <br />%) <br />%) <br />15,441 (12.0 % avg) T777I5 (Tr75% avg) <br />4. The house was built in ? 949 and then complied with <br />all existing ordinances. The land between the house and the lake <br />consists of a steep embankment with a reverse slope extending <br />westward from the top of the embankment. The steep embankment <br />cceat*»s an erosion problem. <br />5. Given the lie of the land, the date of construction <br />of the house and the location of the Pillsbury house to the <br />south, the house is a reasonable distance from the lake (closest <br />point is 57* from the lake). Such house location was permitted <br />when the house was built 40 years ago. The house is as close to <br />the lake as it is largely because of the reverse slope which made <br />it necessary to move the house clo.:*»r to obtain a view of th<» <br />lake. <br />6. In response to Planning Commission input, the <br />applicant*s reviewed and reanalyzed the hardcover on their site. <br />In such further review it was determined that there is a 330 sq. <br />ft. area of large pavers near the dock about 25* from the <br />lakeshore. The applicants amended <br />December 29, 1989 to delete th»- <br />reduction in existing hardcover <br />sq. ft. to 1,161 sq. ft. <br />r Proposal by letter dated <br />ft. of pavers for a net <br />• i?-75* zone of from 1,491 <br />7. The hardcover computation, after reduction in size <br />of applicants* proposed improvements and removal of existing <br />hardcover (pavers by the lake) subsequent to the Planning <br />Commission action, as follows: