My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-09-1990 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1990
>
04-09-1990 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/18/2024 2:20:56 PM
Creation date
10/18/2024 2:18:58 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
457
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
I <br />4490.4 <br />TO: <br />FROM: <br />DATE: <br />Mayor and City Council <br />Mark E. Bcrnhardson, City Administrator <br />April 4, 1990 <br />SUBJECT; Stubbs Bay S^^wcr Projf?ct <br />COOUfCJt MfEDlVG <br />APR 91990 <br />CHY OF OROHO <br />Attachments: A. Stubbs Bay Sewer Project Memo Dated 3/14/90 <br />B. Series of Maps Labeled A Through F <br />ISSUE - <br />1. Consideration of: <br />A. Inclusion of properties presently not included. <br />B. Consideration for excluding selected properties which <br />are currently being considered in the Stubbs Bay area. <br />INTRODUCTION - At the Council's March 26, 1990 meeting Council <br />requested staff to provide criteria and provide recommendation <br />for inclusion of selected arras and exclusion of others in the <br />Stubbs Bay project. <br />The original study area boundary criteria was: <br />A. As shown of map 12 of Coi.p Plan/Sewer Plan. (See <br />Attached Map A.) <br />B. Refined by staff in 1986 to coincide with existing <br />roads and physical boundaries: <br />C. Map A and staff revisions purposely avoided north of <br />Luce Line, west of Tonkawa, and south of Bayside <br />(eastend) since these properties were all subdivided <br />after the 1975 rezoning at greater than 2 acre density, <br />with proven septic sites available and were relatively <br />far from the lake. <br />D. Areas east of Leaf and north of Luce Line were also <br />excluded due to distance from the lake. <br />DISCUSSION - In response to the Council's request, the following <br />recommendations are made: <br />Required Inclusion: <br />Staff feels the criteria for required inclusion in this project <br />should be: <br />A. Within the study area as originally defined or <br />B. Abutting the study area but under 2 acres.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.