Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning File #1507 <br />March 15, 1990 <br />Page 2 of 3 <br />List of Exhibits - <br />Exhibit A - <br />Exhibit B - <br />Exhibit C - <br />Exhibit D - <br />Exhibit E - <br />Exhibit F - <br />Exhibit G-1 <br />Exhibit G-2 <br />Exhibit H-1 <br />Exhibit H-2 <br />Exhibit I-l <br />Exhibit T-2 <br />Application <br />Property Owners List <br />Plat Map <br />Site Plan <br />Building Permit #002402 <br />Amended Floor Plan - 3rd Floor <br />- North Elevation Approved at Time of Building <br />Permit <br />- Amended North Elevation <br />~ South Elevation Approved at Time of Building <br />Permit <br />- Amended South Elevation <br />- West Elevation Approved at Time of Building <br />Permit <br />- Amended West Elevation <br />Review of Application - <br />During a routine building inspection, the inspector noted <br />the addition of windows at the upper third level. The bull .^r <br />was advised to submit amended plans for third floor and <br />structural changes within roc" area. The Zoning staff was <br />vised and with the addition of the third floor, it was <br />necessary to recalculate the height of the structure. The <br />Building Department had other concerns related to required access <br />from floor area in excess of 500 s.f. Review the floor plan for <br />the third floor (Exhibit F), the Building Department's comments <br />are noted on that plan. <br />The architect for the applicant had worked with an adjacent <br />neighboring property's residence a few years back, the William <br />Ulrich home, noting that that structure had an attic area with <br />window and the height was not determined from the ceiling joists <br />of that third story but rather from the mean distance from the <br />second floor to the point of the gable roof. Staff advised that <br />there has been a change in the review as far as interpretatio:. <br />and determination of height based on the current ordinances that <br />govern height allowances. The architect claimed that he had no <br />knowledge that there was any change in interpretation of height <br />from his original dealings with the City with the Ulrich <br />residence, staff advised that there indeed was no code amend ­ <br />ment, but a change in the interpretation in the allowed 2 1/2 <br />story height and the impact of high gable structures with a third <br />story.