My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1971-05-27 Memo, Lot Rearrangement
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
C
>
Caroline Avenue
>
2696 Caroline Avenue - 20-117-23-24-0034
>
Land Use
>
1971-05-27 Memo, Lot Rearrangement
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2024 3:17:16 PM
Creation date
10/16/2024 3:15:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
x Address Old
House Number
2696
Street Name
Caroline
Street Type
Avenue
Address
2696 Caroline Avenue
PIN
2011723240034
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
TO: Ralph Martin <br />FROM: Mike Scheller <br />DATE: May 27, 1971 <br />SUBJECT: Division Rearrangement - Harold Roberts - Caroline Avenue <br />( Elmo Ginkle-Contractor) <br />Harold Roberts is asking for a rearrangement of Lots 1 through 5, <br />Block 2, Casco Heights. <br />Each lot consists of 50' X 150' for a total of 2501 X 150'. When <br />divided, there would be two lots, 80' X 150' and one 90' X 1501- <br />12,000 and 13,500 square feet. The area is in R -ID, half -acre, 100' <br />frontage. ( Half Acre needs 21,000 Sq. Ft.) <br />Sewer service is one lot away but does not service the property. <br />Water is pending. <br />NOTE: The Planning Commission re commands that the division <br />be into two lots to better meet the zoning requiremin*s. <br />See P.C. minutes. I suggest we approve the division <br />if he will divide it im" into TWO lots. We also should <br />require sewer. <br />Ralph Martin 6/11/71 <br />FURTHER REMARKS: The Council agreed to take a look at the <br />property by our next meeting. He has not paid Mm any <br />assessments for sewer and the village would construct <br />the sewer main in the street with ap!�roximately 350 feet <br />which would be asi;essed to him plus the 3225,, unit <br />charge for each building site. <br />If you a,)prove this, we should go ahead with <br />this small construction project right away* <br />he two lots. <br />I feel that we should only allowt <br />Ralph Martin 6/24/71 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.