Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD MARCH 12, 1990 <br />ZONING FILE #1489-HARDIN CONTINUED <br />additional slab poured with the intention of requesting variance <br />approval and completing the building at a future date. Howeve", <br />the Ordinance changed after the slab was poured and Mr. Hardin <br />now requires two variances. <br />Councilmember Goetten said that allowing Mr. Hardin to pour <br />the additional slab was almost guaranteeing him that he would be <br />able to put structure over it. <br />Mabusth noted that in the area where Mr. Hardin resides, <br />hardcover is not an issue. The issue is the structure itself. <br />At the time Mr. Ha .din constructed the building, he met the <br />requirements of *-he Accessory Structure Ordinance in effect at <br />that time. <br />It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember <br />Nettles, to approve the variances to allow an oversized accessory <br />structure for Mr. John Hardin. Coun^ member Goetten was <br />.cympachetic to Mr. Hardin's need for cn« extra space and <br />complimented him on the appearance of the building. Goetten said <br />that there is no demonstrated hardship to warrant the variances. <br />Councilmember Peterson asked for clarification regarding the <br />notv**_ion "garage new position", shown on the survey. Mr. Hardin <br />expla-.'ed that he had moved the existing garage to that location <br />prior 1.0 constructing the ncv building. Callahan interpreted the <br />purpose of the Accessory Structure Ordinance had to do with the <br />aesthetics of structures on a lot. If aesthetics are the focus, <br />then Mr. Callahan believed that this accessory structure would <br />look more pleasing if the corner were filled in. . Motion, Ayes- <br />3, Peterson, Goetten, Nay, Motion passed. <br />#1491 JACK RHODE <br />1690 SHADYWOOD ROAD <br />RENEWAL VARIANCE <br />RESOLUTION #2769 <br />This matter had been approved as part of the Consent Agenda. <br />Councilmember Goetten indicated that she had intended to remove <br />this item for discussion, but had overlooked this item she had <br />circled on her agenda. <br />It was moved by Councilmember Goetten, seconded by <br />Councilmember Nettles, to remove this item from the Consent <br />Agenda so that it may be discussed. Motion, Ayes-5, Nays-0, <br />Motion passed. <br />City Administrator Bernhardson explained the facts involved <br />w’th this renewal variance and added that the applicant had <br />SUL. ■tted a building permit application. <br />Councilmember Goetten stated that she was not aware that the <br />applicant had already submitted an application for the building <br />- 16 -