03-26-1990 Countil Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

13190.6 SUMMARY OF QUESTIONS - STUBBS BAY SENBR MEETING DATED 1/30/90 Following are major questions and responses to those questions from the last meeting. Further significant questions included the following: !• Why are certain areas included in the project and other are-»s excluded? A. Two acre - There are certain two acre properties that are included in the project because of thei • proximity to the necessary trunk system route (specifically those in the Stubbs Bay north area), This is In part also due to decisions defining the study area boundaries made several years ago, when this area was identified as critical based on lake adjacency. Other two acre areas such as Sussex will not be included and it becomes an issue of where the demarcation is made. The area for Oxford could be included because of the lakeshore (however it was indicated by a resident of the Oxford area that at the present time six to eight residents are opposed to doing it.) B. What about inclusion of 2 additional houses to the east of Leaf Street? There are two houses that are served by a private driveway further east on Leaf Street, staff is presently exploring whether the five total houses east of Leaf Street should be included based on their septic capabilities. C. Cygnet Place - Presently Cygnet does not require service as any failing septic systems have been corrected. The inclusion of this, however, in the project would not substantially lower the cost of the project in Stubbs Bay. Any purchase of capacity for future development of a Cygnet Place sewer would by the same rationale require the people in Stubbs Bay to pay a portion of the capacity on Tonkawa and have those rebated so that in effect it may not be to any gain to those in the area. Additionally Cygnet will be an expensive place to sewer because of the existing topography. 2. There were comments regarding the specific design and