My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-26-1990 Countil Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1990
>
03-26-1990 Countil Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/14/2024 2:17:06 PM
Creation date
10/14/2024 2:15:38 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
385
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
13190.5 <br />TO: Mayor and City Council <br />FROM: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Acministrato <br />OATS: January 31, 1990 <br />SUBJECT: Stubbs Bay Sewer Project <br />U!l/ <br />II <br />Attachment: A. Stubbs Bay Significant Questions - January 30, <br />1990 Meeting <br />B. Stubbs May Memo Dated 1/16/90 <br />C. Stubbs Bay Letter Draft <br />D. Draft Petition and Special Assessment Waiver <br />E. Letter from Terry Olson <br />ISSUE <br />1. Provide a summary of significant questions from the meeting on <br />January 30th. <br />2. Outline process steps for Council to consider if this is the <br />appropriate route to go. <br />3. Provide opportunity for review of the letter and draft <br />petition prior to its transmittal to the area. <br />4. Present information relevant to any City contribution to the <br />project in advance of the letter being trasmitted. <br />INTRODUCTION - After a brief overview at the beginning of the <br />meeting which encapsulated the presentation from last summer the <br />forum was opened up to questions and comments. While several <br />questions were repetitious of those from the previous meeting <br />there were some new ones that are summarized in Attachment A. <br />DISCUSSION <br />Issue i\ - Meeting Summary - In addition to the questions <br />outlined *t he re were comments such as the gentlemen who felt that <br />the project was needed even though he had sufficient room for an <br />additional septic system. He felt that the property was much <br />more marketable with a sewer system, providing a wider range of <br />people who were willing to buy it, together with it being a <br />permanent solution. What was not mentioned was the ability of <br />someone to add to their house with sewer, which may well be <br />restricted without it. <br />It was indicated in the discussion that the City would consider <br />the project if 70% of the people in the area were willing to sign <br />the waiver at this point. The process of petition and signing <br />the waiver for a specific amount allows each individual person to <br />decide if the benefit to them of the project is sufficient to <br />"sign on for that amount" rather than the C^i^jj^^rmitting a Court <br />1 1
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.