Laserfiche WebLink
Summinq up we conclude that with a proper operating <br />system as proposed could provide water of at least equal <br />quality to that present discharge from the draft surface. <br />However, major problems appear to exist in the successful <br />sustained long term operation of the system proposed and <br />we believe it would require extensive maintenance and it <br />would soon be discarded or otherwise .ignored. For this <br />reason we do not believe that a long range solution to <br />the water quality problems have been provided and would <br />reserve final judgment until such time as additional <br />supplimentary data is submitted showing detail data <br />dimensions and location. Further the soil test seem <br />to preclude the construction of any system which would <br />feed the water back into the ground water table as the <br />soils are rather impervious and such a solution does <br />not appear practible. <br />Our review has not attempted to address itself <br />specifically to the items raised by Mr. Ripple regarding <br />the effect on the light and air circulation. However, <br />the visual changes referred to in his report appear <br />accurate. However, we have not seen the detailed plans <br />on the proposed house and would have to reserve absolute <br />judgement until such plans our available. <br />If you have any further questions or desire further <br />comments regarding this project do not hesitate to contact <br />US. <br />Very truly yours, <br />MCCOMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC. <br />William H. McCombs, P.E. <br />WHM:j1 <br />