My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-12-1990 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1990
>
03-12-1990 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/8/2024 10:35:23 AM
Creation date
10/8/2024 10:19:51 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
820
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
KIHUTBS OP THE PLANNING COMMISSION !TING JANUARY 16, 1990 <br />ii:4»PROPOSED ZONING AMENDMENTS CONTIN1 <br />Kelley said that the first point to consider is whether the <br />pool is in the ground or above it. The next point is whether any <br />part of it extends beyond 6* in height above grade. <br />Mabusth informed the Planning Commission that the reason <br />this matter has been brought forward is due to the questions <br />raised in the Peterson application for a pool. <br />It was moved by Kelley, seconded by Cohen, to recommend <br />leaving the recently adopted Accessory Structure Ordinance as is. <br />Motion, Ayes-5, Nays-0, Motion passed. <br />#1457 ALAN CARLSON <br />3140 WATERTOWN ROAD <br />PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION <br />CONTINUATION OP PUBLIC HEARING 7:25 P.N. TO 7:30 P.M. <br />Mr. Alan Carlson was present for this public hearing, as was <br />Mr. Jerry Sunde and Mr. Gary Petersen. <br />Zoning Administrator Mabusth provided a brief review of this <br />application. Mabusth noted that Lot 2, Block 4, does not meet <br />the required lot width at the 50' setback. Mabusth said that <br />with the revised plan, there are no longer any flag lots and Lot <br />7 achieves access from the extension of the east corridor road. <br />Mabusth recommended that there be a shared access for Lots 1 and <br />2. Mabusth said that drainage pertaining to off-site <br />improvements is still in the review pre *;ess. Mabusth said that <br />should there be a change in a lot line due to something that had <br />to be agreed to as part of final approval of the Minnehaha Creek <br />Watershed District, it will come back tc the Planning Commission. <br />Brown asked how the drainage easements were designated on <br />the plat? <br />Mabusth explained that the conservation and flowage <br />easements extend out everywhere to the 970* elevation. Mabusth <br />said that the area where the berm is to be located, the <br />conservation and flowage easement will be amended to go to the <br />968* elevation. <br />Planning Commissioner Hanson asked why the cul-de-sac was <br />being placed as indicated? <br />Mr. Carlson replied that the cul-de-sac location was <br />determined by the topography; the ground in that location is <br />higher. <br />Chairman Kelley asked Mr. Carlson if he objected to any of <br />the conditions of approval? <br />Mr. Carlson Indicated that he had no objections. <br />Mabusth said that it should be noted that this is a 16 lot <br />plat, not a 17 lot plat. Mabusth said the Outlot C is on the <br />Li
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.