03-12-1990 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

ez r :ter •the subdivider•) Lon application wi thial pla t of prope rt y the property•) and• , nd mailed notic e inet. seq. and the City o Plannin g C ommission and January 16, 1990 heard concerning this ieak t h ereon: and l9 h e ld on March 1 2 amen d ed sub d iv i s i o �� fi ndi n g s of fa ct: � RR-1B S ingle Family iri ng a mini mum of 2 0 n d w ithin each newi y the original 17 lot exceeds the 2.0 acre rds. ired l ot w i dth to the l ne. ::cess v i a a netw o r k o f alcc e s s o n t o W a t erto w n o t o w n e r . ➔9 0 , t t o nal G l e nn c oo k , city b e exceptable a n d a ppro '.'a l o f t h e 6. The Minne hah a creek wa t e r sh e d D is tri c t g r a n t edconditional permit appro val (89-16 7) of t h e drainage,grading and ero sion c o ntro l pla n s of the Indian creek platat their February 15, 1990 mee t i ng.7 . In memos da ted January 8, 1 990 and March 7, 1990,Michael P. caffron, As sistan t P l an n t,,g &zonin gAdministrator, confirmed that al l 1 6 l ots had b,e n teste d and found to have sui tabl e ar eas for on-site septicdevelopment. 8. The prop osed co nfiguration and ove rall desinn of th e lot s within the p lat finds that each lot satisfieS the lo t s t andard s o f t h e RR- l B zoning dist ri ct requi ri ng no variances with t h e g r a n t in g o f t h e a pproval o f t h i s subdivi sio n. Each lot c an be develop ed a s a res id e n tial unit without the need f or future var ian ces. 9. Th e orono Cot>nci 1 ac cepts the fi nd i ngs of the Plann ing com m is s i o n i n a ppr ovi n g a v a r ia n c e to section 10.ss, subdivision 8 that wou ld pr oh i b it anY land a lterat ions within a defined protected wetland. Th e f ollowing f indings were n ote d by the applicant and acc ep te d by t he Pla n ning commisson: A) In crease d h ardcover from a roa d 2-3 t imes longe r would crea te more storm water run-o f f and envi ronmentalburdon on s u rrounding la n d . Th e u s e of 1/2 acre of t he woo ded area w ill have 1e ss environmental i mpact on the surrounding area. In a d dition, a pp licant will prov ide r e p l a c e m ent for f u rther r e t en tion to off-set additiona l Bl toss of majo r port i o ns u f tre e s if a periph era lfilling. road is constructed outside of th e w etland arPas. C) Maj or visu a 1 and aest hetic impact on a dja ce nt prop 0 rt ies to the east as ther e a re no plan ti ng s to provide screening from roadway and the low er elevatio ns along the eas t lot line. D)The nature of the wetlands ba s cha nged over t he 30 years since it was origina l ly de s ig na t ed as a protect ed a rea.Ma tu re trees n ow occupy what was once c lassifie d as a mars h land. There is no obvious sign of flooding o r re ten ti o n o f fl ood w at e r s as a d itc hing s yste m b a s d rie d c u t t h e a rea an d a l l o w e d t h e tr ees to nouris h , Page 2 of 7