Laserfiche WebLink
stri ct did not a l l o w i n h ib it or r ed i re ct eq u i r ed t o pr o v id e r(970' elevat i o n) to .l o o d p l ai n /w e t l ands variances as r o ad-, we t land . Pe r D N R 1 is clas sified as a t ed wet l a nd . Maj or � t he 970 ' elev ation :y pr o vid e s a m a j o r hed .A cre e k fl ows the p r op er t y. The tio nal po nding a re asinage eas ements w il l970• ele v a t i o n an d,e e a st and dr aina e ­tl la tio n o f t h& r�ad e m l i n y o ur p a c k e ts no t installed al ong t he p r oper t y b u t w a s n th e n o r t h c e n tr a l t o f th e d e s i gn at e d <br />>l e areas for pr i mar yttive that spe c i f i c! ins tallati o n o f the rl d al s o i n c lud e t h e �nti a l u s e . Sp e c i a l-he chain o f ti t l e ofr.ev i e w of t h e f i n a l I t h a t L o t S, B l o ck 1 !d pr i o r t o a ny l and,uir e sp ecia 1 p l a s tic Fo x Be nd su bdi vi s i on Lo ts 1 and S, Bl o ck U thwest c o rner o n l y)• c o v e na nt s s u b m i tt drde f i na l a me n d m e n :s <br />Zoning File tl457 March 7, 1990 Page 4 of 4 Grading/Erosion Cont ol/Landscaping -Review Exhibit DD, er osion contro l has been defined on thegrading plan. Note, sediment fi lter will be installed within tots, Block 1. A major ponding ar ea wi ll be created in tot 1, Block 2, required to rep lace area filled by private roads within floodpla�_n/w etl and area. Note the co�jcern that Gaffro n has definedfor tot 5 where the road alterati ons come within 1-2' of the mo stnorthern septic area.The Planning Commission recomme nded approval of the entrancemonuments at approximat ely 5 1/2' high, run ning 10 line al feet,placed on the east and west si des of the entran ce driv e at Watert own Road. The app licant has not discussed sign age orproposed an y specifi c si gnage for the mo num ent area. ThePlanning Co mmission found them accep ta ble and quite typic al ofother monuments approved by the City for a rural su bdivision. Asmonuments exc eed 3' in hei ght, the y ar e su bject to standard sunder section 10.03, subdivision 16 -Traffic Visi bility. <br />La ndscaping is propo sed wit hin th e entranc e area of the <br />su bdivision. Forma l landscapi ng plans has not been proposed as <br />developer feels the natural physical amenities of this p r operty <br />provide the necessary aesthetics. <br />Purther Directions to Applicant on the Review of Pinal Drafts of <br />Preli■inary Plans - <br />Site grading improvements cann ot comme nce until the Cit y <br />Eng in eer has pr ovided a wr it ten rep ort on the final <br />grading/drainage/erosion contro l an d plan s for road. <br />As for the final grading plan s, staff would as k that the <br />drainage direc��= �v che west boarder of tots 1 and 2, Block 1 be <br />directed along the west lot lines by either swaling or a drainage <br />ditch so th at drain age can out let to the drainage ditch along <br />Watertown Road drai ning westward . <br />The enclosed reso luti on has bean dr afted per the Planning <br />Comm ission's ap proval reco mmend ation pre sented fo r Counc il's <br />review and action .