My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-12-1990 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1990
>
03-12-1990 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/8/2024 10:35:23 AM
Creation date
10/8/2024 10:19:51 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
820
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
IMUTBS OF OROHO COUNCIL MEETING OP JANUARY 8, 1990PILE #1452>PEMBBRTON CONTIN10 have to stand up and be counted on something like this, jolng to allow people to build over a deck in the 0-75?"Btten further said to Mr. and Mrs. Pembertons, "You buy y, and you have these existing situations and sometimes just not able to do the kinds of things that you might 5 do with a substandard piece of property. This is Sard; this is lakeshore".yor Grabek said that he could not disagree with Goetten t the concern of covering over decks is often relayed to leant when approval for a deck is gi/en. Grabek said "My ncern with this one, as with the other one, is that it is Bone wanting to add on the entire deck, it's squaring off . Grabek said that he has trouble with these when the <br />Its work with the City in alleviating hardcover concerns. <br />rnhardson posed a hypothetical question of whether the <br />would allow this application if the deck did not exist. <br />i general consensus was no. <br />was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by CounciImember <br />, to allow the variance for the 95 s.f., provided that all <br />hardcover proposed to be removed, is removed and so <br />d by staff. Nettles said that he had previously voted <br />this and had been prepared to vote no again. He felt, <br />, the applicants had made significant changes in terms of <br />Lshing what he considered to be the more important of two <br />Mayor Grabek asked that there be strong language included <br />resolution prohibiting any additional building in the 0- <br />back area and an explanation of the pre-existing deck, <br />nember Peterson asked whether or not the Pembertons would <br />onsider removing the deck? Mr. Pemberton replied that he <br />•refer not to. Motion, Ayes-2, Goetten, Petersen and <br />n. Nay, Motion failed. <br />was moved by CounciImember Goetten, seconded by <br />nember Peterson, to conceptually deny this application and <br />s^aff to prepare a resolution of denial for the January <br />) Council Meeting. Motion, Ayes-3, Grabek, Nettles, Nay, <br />>assed. <br />tORGB PILLSBURT <br />kCXBTTS POINT ROAD <br />IS/ CONDITIONAL USB PERMIT <br />, and Mrs. Pillsbury were present for this application, as <br />. Herb Baldwin, Landscape Architect, Mr. Thomas Meyer, <br />:t and Mr. Bob Mitchell, Attorney. <br />ty Administrator Bernhardson explained that this <br />tion involved the approval of variances to construct a <br />use and a conditional use permit to do minor grading of <br />eshore bank. Bernhardson said, "Since this matter was <br />J:
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.