Laserfiche WebLink
ZONING PILE NO. I470^66**° "OnCE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTIONBay, MN 55323 473-7357 .Notice; 10/20/895 Tonkaw^Road COPIES TO:r Lake, MN 55356Subdivision ■vot';:‘T;;r"TA-,-;i„";- - - - - -Conission reconends the following:Bd for reasons noted below,PBCIAL CONDITIONS -inning proposal(s) for review. General comments <br />if a standard p 1 au ^i3 prooo house) must be within <br />ble if a PRD is proposed. Some flexibility may bS <br />hether a standard plat or prd <br />_ consider granting lot ar« va/i.„'’o°-."’' ?l^""i"g Commission 8nce/l7 acres density. ances, given the overall 3 <br />Laiming Commission would prefer <br />Asao, and Deters corridors be provided <br />.ns with those properties. ^ parties, given the access <br />vision; paved width*oVactual*^ro^/rf^?^°^^^®^® throughout the ouses are served, oerhena to be standard 24* if <br />are served. Perhaps some flexibility on paving if less <br />^VtloS! ‘>oth a PRD and a standard plat for <br />?9Tg lllliVi ll <br />\h <br />ITO:Prw.:Date:Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator BernhardsonMichael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator October 10, 1989Subject: #1470 Daniel Parten, 4300 Bayside Road -Preliminary Subdivision - Public HearingZoning District - RR-IA, 5 acre, unseweredApplication - 3-lot Class III subdivision to create two new 5 acre building lots in addition to existing residence.List of Exhibits <br />Exhibit <br />Exhibit <br />Exhibit <br />Exhibit <br />Exhibit A - Application Exhibit B - Plat Map <br />I - Property Owners List <br />I - Preliminary Plat DrawingsCcV-'.-c re <br />I - Letter from Neighboring Property Owner White <br />' - Sketches by Staff Including: <br />1. Neighboring Property Ownership <br />2. Acreage Layout <br />3. Scale Concept Plan Showing Building Sites <br />4. Existing & Proposed Driveway System <br />5. Staff Conceptual Sketch A <br />6. .Staff Conceptual Sketch B <br />Exhibit G <br />7. Staff Conceptual Sketch C .v <br />- Subdivision Code Section 11.10, Subdivision 21 <br />4;;.03.it/ <br />Pertinent Pacts - <br />1. Proposed lot areas are as follows: <br />Proposed Lot 1 = 5.2 acres (existing house) <br />Proposed Lot 2 * 5.0 acres <br />Proposed Lot 3 ■ 5.0 acres <br />Outiot A » 1,87 acres <br />Total Acreage ■» 17.06 acres (per survey - does this <br />figure Include 33' of right-of-way for Watertown Road?) <br />2. Proposed Lot 1 would not abut a private or public outiot <br />road, but is proposed to be served by 'n easement driveway, <br />which conflicts with Section 11.10, division 21 (c). Lot <br />1 contains the existing house aj ’’e existing primary <br />drainfield. The site evaluation .^rt on file Indicates <br />there are no suitable alternate urainfield sites within <br />proposed Lot 1 and the only apparent alternate site is <br />within Outiot A. The southerly 60' of Lot 1 contains an <br />existing private "road'* easement in favor of the Reiersgord <br />property to the east. Applicant has not excluded this <br />existing road easement from his calculation of lot area as <br />required by the subdivision code.