Laserfiche WebLink
;OP ORONO COONCIL MEETING OF FEBRDAFI 22,1990p»rfe«n said that it Is disadvantageous to have theo^rSity street running through this heavily woodedh°t\l wetLnL and Luce Line Trail.He said that theternalcirculation"is an excessive term to descrioeisesonadriveway.ina Mavor Callahan said that it is likely that at somethe(Stare,the 5-acre zone will be reduced to 2-acre orTheCityhastolookahead.Parten said that the future zoning of thaternhimandtheissuesinvolvingaccesswould be dealtthetimethepropertyisrezoned.iT.stissurethatthisiswhere a road should be placed? <br />m t e.sit-he citv is not sure from an overall <br />riau"on“1n‘t"hat thSs"u='wh^re a --^=h-ld be placed <br />■v Mr“%a'’r7ln''s“p%%pe“rt‘ri-ri'’f °m'ay’’be f“rVhe? <br />fled Cal’ahan said that due to the topography of the <br />“he^-loc“tVo "\"efng proposed for the road is the best <br />I • <br />nhardson said that Mr.Parten initially a <br /><slrm that had a 50'outlot coming up from the soutn <br />ng along the south property linenr^r^h and west.Bernhardson said that he had ta.'.Kea <br />Pa??e^rtgarding a variationof the initial P’-oposal <br />;il SccompUsh what Callahan had indicated he would like <br />?ve. <br />narhen said that the property owners to the north of his <br />husi1r:?rsed!‘-^5e‘sndnLr^hrp"Lnn"i/g%^^^^^^^ <br />-rorcetr^'”L''Lrd '^rt row"hts-;?»’o-^fir^fv^^^^a <br />e'^««”ngement and he is not creating any new lots. <br />uncilmember Goetten informed Mr. Parten that proceeding <br />PRD would allow him mote options. <br />ttles observed that due to the P*;oP°s«‘d driveway bei^ <br />y* <br />•parten s that due to the fact he had not «^eceiv®d the <br />*info^mati from the staff,he would request that the <br />table thi .matter. <br />'tinq Mayor Callahan informed Mr.Parten that when this <br />'^s he^rd^again that he will recommend that there be a 50 <br />MINUTES OF ORONO COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 22, 1990outlot rather than 20' and that there be underlying easements.Councilmember Nettles agreed u’ith Callahan.It was moved by Acting Mayor Callahan, seconded byCouncilmember Goetten, to table this application to the March 12,1990 Council Meeting. Motion, Ayes-4, Nays-0, Motion passed.#1486 SUSSEX SQUARE DEVELOPMENT 3020 FOX STREET PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION RESOLUTION |Ms. Nina Wildman was present for this matter, as was Mr. Mark Gronberg, the Surveyor/Engineer for Ms. Wildman. <br />Bernhardson reviewed the information involved with this <br />application and noted that the Planning Commission had <br />recommended denial. <br />Mabusth briefly noted that there had been opposition to this <br />proposal expressed by the adjacent property owne.'s. <br />Mr. Gronberg said that Lot 7, Block 2 is ,ery conducive to a <br />tennis court because of the shape. He said that there has been <br />much interest in tennis courts expressed by future lot owners. <br />Gronberg said that more than likely a tennis court will be <br />constructed on that lot whether it is done by the developer of <br />the individual that purchases the lot. He said that there would <br />be more control exercised if the developer constructed the court. <br />Mr. Gronberg noted that the tennis court meets all of the <br />required setbacks. He also said that there will be nothing to <br />restrict the construction of tennis courts on other lots, but <br />having this court available to the residents of the subdivision <br />would probably discourage individual courts. <br />Acting Mayor Callahan asked what the use of Lot 7 will be if <br />not used for a tennis court? <br />Ms. Wildman replied that it would available for building. <br />It disturbed Councilmember Goetten that the subdivision had <br />already been approved and this request was being presented after <br />the fact. Goetten believed that it should be the responsibility <br />of individual property owners to build their own tennis courts. <br />She said that it is not in keeping with this area to have a <br />tennis court located at the entrance of the subdivision. Goetten <br />had attended the Planning Commission meeting when this was <br />discussed many of the neighbors were very opposed to this <br />propsal. <br />Ms. Wildman said that the reason she was coming back with <br />this request was because she had been approached by an interested <br />party wishing to buy Lot 7 and install a tennis court. She <br />thought that it may be best to put the tennis court in herself <br />because it is at the entry to the subdivision. She said that she