My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-12-1990 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1990
>
03-12-1990 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/8/2024 10:35:23 AM
Creation date
10/8/2024 10:19:51 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
820
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Le #1470 B, 1990 3CoHBission RecoMendation -tSO- «ld« outlet fto» Boyolde Bo.d to th. e.ot lot lino.20* wide outlet extendln9 to the northerly parcel.Drainage easenent for ravine to be 15' wide.Standard drainage and utility eaaenenta to be granted.Standard road and utilities easenent to be granted over <br />50' outlet. <br />At the time that a ®the existing ^driveway <br />\•‘c^^^l'‘;^.^«‘d^^v":^a^^"ill b^'-v'e «'be ungraded to <br />r private ..oad standards. <br />park fee tor Lot 2 to be elected with the building <br />mit. <br />>rotect drainfield sites. <br />NO requirement for nature conservance property access <br />Tient. <br />Orono Road System Review - <br />ouncl 1-s "•Jl\‘5^'oa? 8"Mndar'ds^ ComIu <br />‘Jwf 5o teJiel of toad needs in that general area. <br />,f« to tht toad study document in your packet. <br />study generally connectlng*ro*ad between <br />'or a future route ^ ^ midway between the <br />; Road and Bayside Road, generally recommends <br />:e and Stubb's Bay property line)• corridor be provided generally ai y Depending on <br />the Fatten and '“;7"„“the Fattin property <br />the corridor ** 7if2rMord ’it would have a distinct >d by Fatten and pelersgord, <br />n both those properties. <br />Zoning File #1470 February 8, 1990 Page 3 of 3Staff R«c ndation -If the Council wishes to proceed with acquiring dedications for future roadway in this area, that certainly affects the applicants' proposed lot line rearrangement. Council’s options are as follows:1. Approve per the Planning Commission recommendation.2. Direct applicants to work with staff to revise the proposal to create a 50 ’ corridor along the entire length of the east property line for future road.3. Refer the application back to Planning Commission for further consideration in light of road study recommendations. Note also that the City might wish to consider updating its Comprehensive Transportation Plan. <br />4. Table for other leasons. <br />5. Other.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.