Laserfiche WebLink
5S OF CTB PLMmn.0 COMHISSIOS MEBTISG SBFTEHBER W, IMSlit to 25% which is the maximum allowed.There were no cements fro» the public reg.rdln, this better he public hearing was closed.It was moved by ^ tT^rVco°mm^^^?i”’leK«ho«* .«Va=h%«°ien=e of epproxieately 1.5 ’ and thatsn“M“?on%a;sei.t WALTER H. PEMBERTOH SBADTWOOD ROAD <br />^S^?faeii^rPubI?=“aiion';nd Certificate of Mailin, were <br />noted. <br />Mr. and Mrs. Pemberton were present for this matter. <br />Assistant Pl“""^,"’ *"„ 3al"to’convert^a"exi^^^ grade <br />room. <br />rselrman Kelley asked whether the Pemberton's had received <br />i"pSt™“m\he\'/ neighbor to the southP <br />Mr. Pemberton said ‘hat he had spoken to his neighbors on <br />I sides and they had no objection. <br />Planning Commissioner Brown asked if there was existin, <br />icover that could be removed? <br />There were no comments from the public regardin, this matter <br />the public hearing was closed. <br />Planning hV°ha"d ”"d\"cated"'that"l^rwould be <br />o^in, haricjvir from the back of the house. <br />thfpla«?f that’fs%r«Ud tc“it u*nd«ijin| t“e locSeS! <br />ce^oirpuncMnris nea“/^^^^^^ <br />Xt was moved by Planning <br />inning ^ rh2'olastio underlying the rockbed in <br />.lication provided ‘h>‘ ‘h« P‘”‘‘=,“,„<,ved. Motion, Ayes-4, <br />N"°'''^a^d’Vu.7,'MVy, due'^M their preference to see hardcover <br />ioved rather converted into permanent structure. Motion <br />MIMUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING SEPTEMBER 18p 1J89ZONING FILE Mi 441-COPLEY CONTINTOEO passed.#1453 WILLIAM HIBBS1905 EAGERNESS POINT ROADVARIANCESPUBLIC HEARING 8:15 P.M. TO 8:25 P.M.The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were duly noted.The applicant was present for this matter.Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained that Mr. Hibbs was requesting a hardcover variance to enclose an existing canopy area. Gaffron said that there would be no increase in hardcover resulting from the conversion of the canopy/bituminous area into a screen porch.Chairman Kelley told Mr. Hibbs that he was concerned about <br />the fact that there was no existing garage. He said that more <br />than likely there will be a future request for a garage. <br />Mr. Hibbs replied that a tuck under garage would be most <br />practical for this property. He said if a tuck under garage were <br />constructed approximately 1,000 s.f. of bituminous could be <br />removed. <br />Planning Commissioner Cohen said that he would prefer to see <br />Mr. Hibbs make application for a garage prior to proceeding with <br />this application for the screen porch. <br />Chairman Kelley said that he preferred not to change <br />hardcover into structural hardcover. <br />Mr. Hibbs said that the hardcover already exists. <br />Planning Commissioner Bellows expanded on Chairman Kelley's <br />concern about converting hardcover into structural hardcover. <br />She said that in order for the porch to be constructed, footings <br />would have to be poured which would make more permanent an <br />already excessive hardcover condition. <br />There were no comments from the public regarding this matter <br />and the public hearing was closed. <br />It was moved by Planning Commissioner Cohen, seconded by <br />Planning Commissioner Bellows, to recommend denial of application <br />#1453 requesting a hardcover variance to enclose an existing <br />canopy area. Motion, Ayes»5, Hanson, Nay due to his belief that <br />hardcover is hardcover. Motion passed.