03-12-1990 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

S OP ORONO CODNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 22, 1990Ayes-4, Nays-0,UCE BICHANICH::akb street)N #2763^Bichanich was present for the review of this 'f Administrator Bernhardson explained ^h4o»llOW th.Cit‘y V„d tilagreementregardingthefutureof the septic system on Mr. Bichanich's property.ron said that the resolution requires that Mr n as«,sn,ent appeal waiver lorm before the reVolifiH t| ^Aiclnl Circumstances would evolve addition the contract for deedsadditiontothehouseisconstructed? "na;iiS ‘or%xp“ai\“rthrsm?;;""* ;ii"”b‘l‘'i„“taned.‘'’"--‘l^ble a ig Mayor Callahan questioned whether it would hr to upgrade the existing cabin-like structure on thi that variances would be required before that could be upgraded to a livable state. ‘^"‘^^'^stood that it was the applicant ’s «llldrt^"a!llw^Vh:ti“‘='fin.ncT.t “llld^*lill“f%y“la ‘i°"''^combination parcels are being purchased on ft f ^®t combination cannot be done until fhtf Callahan suggested that it be required the contracts are paid, a lot combination be done. ^ Councilmember Nettles, seconded by Acting Lahan, to approve the side setback variance with the that at such time that the contracts for d?ed are oaid » f>avina'^rtf^" asked hov staff w^i 11paying'off of the contracts for deed? Cullahan asked >1 MINUTES OF ORONO COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 22, 19vJMr. Bichanich when the contracts will be paid in tall? Mr, Bichanich replied that one contract will be paid in April, the other in 5 years. Gaffron suggested placing that information in the City's tickler file. Peterson asked whether Mr. Bichanich would be assessed for two sewer units when available? Gaffron said that issue has not been addressed. Gaffron suggested that it be indicated that the lot with the principal structure would be assigned a unit, the other lot would not. He said that would be a tool to encourage that the lots be combined. He said, however, if someone attempts to build on the other lot, they should be charged for a sewer unit. Councilmember Nettles amended his motion to address that issue in the resolution. Acting Mayor Callahan seconded. Motion, Ayes-4, Nays-0, Motion p.’»ssed.#1470 DAN 6 RUTH PARTEN 4300 BAYSIDE ROAD SUBDIVISION Mr. Par ten was present for this matter. City Administrator Bernhardson provided a brief history and explanation of this application. Bernhardson said that he had met with Mr. Patten today to discuss his objectives and options. An issue that concerns Mr. Parten is the point at which the "private driveway" would be upgraded with hard surface. He and Mr. Parten discussed the long term goal being the possible future need for a north/south road. There could, perhaps be a delay of upgrading th* private road until such time that a third lot were to develop or a permanent public road to the south is completed. Mr. Parten has indicated that he would like to proceed with the Planning Commission's recommendation. Gaffron reviewed the Planning Commission's recommendations. Gaffron said that the north/south driveway access is being configured as shown because the Planning Commission did not want Lot ? to be a flag lot. Councilmember Goetten asked Gaffron where the 50' road corridor referred to in his memo would be located. Gaffron said that based on the discussion at the previous Council meeting, the City may wish to have a corridor ext ..ding north along the east property line to provide internal circulation. Gaffron said if it is the intent of the City to provide access to the northern properties, that corridor could be extended further north. Goetten asked whether Mr. Parten would have adequate land for three 5-acre lots if the 50' corridor is included in the plat? Gaffron replied that if both the 50' outlots along the east boundary and a 50' outlot along the existing driveway are included it would have an impact on the amount of dry buildable land available. 8