My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 6055
Orono
>
Resolutions, Ordinances, Proclamations
>
Resolutions
>
Reso 0001-7499
>
Reso 6000 - 6099-December 13, 2010-December 12, 2011
>
Resolution 6055
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2020 1:09:16 PM
Creation date
10/28/2015 1:25:44 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
o,�,. <br /> 0 0 <br /> CITY of ORONO <br /> ti <br /> RESOLUTION OF TH�CII 5 COUNCIL <br /> `�kESI'i0 NO. <br /> a. The property contains 18,180 s.f. (0.42 acre) in area and has 88-feet in width. <br /> b. Sanitary sewer is available. <br /> c. There is no additional land available to bring the lot area into conformity. <br /> d. The Applicants' request will alleviate a practical difficulty inherent to the <br /> property and not created by the Applicants. <br /> e. The Applicants' request will not alter the essential character of the <br /> neighborhood and will result in minimal negative impact on adjacent <br /> properties. <br /> f. The 6' x 11.5' second-story addition will result in minimal additional massing <br /> of the house. <br /> g. The Applicants' request is in harmony with the purpose and intent of the <br /> ordinance. <br /> h. The applicants have demonstrated that enforcing the lot area and lot width <br /> provisions of the Zoning Ordinance deprive the applicant of the reasonable <br /> use of their property. <br /> 4. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and <br /> recommendation of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by <br /> the applicants and the public, and the effect of the proposed variance on the <br /> health, safety and welfare of the community. <br /> 5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to <br /> it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting <br /> the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire <br /> hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a <br /> convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a practical difficulty; is <br /> necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in <br /> keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of <br /> the City. <br /> Page 2 of 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.