My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 6071
Orono
>
Resolutions, Ordinances, Proclamations
>
Resolutions
>
Reso 0001-7499
>
Reso 6000 - 6099-December 13, 2010-December 12, 2011
>
Resolution 6071
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/10/2020 12:45:30 PM
Creation date
10/28/2015 1:18:01 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
� O� <br /> � O O <br /> � -; � <br /> CITY of ORONO <br /> ti <br /> ��� �G~ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> `�k'ESH.�4' NO. � � � 1 <br /> 3. The Planning Commission reviewed this application at a public hearing held on <br /> August 15, 2011 and recommended approval of a side street setback variance <br /> based on the following findings: <br /> a. The property contains 7,430 s.f. (0.17 acre) in area and has 75 feet in width. <br /> b. Sanitary sewer is available. <br /> c. There is no additional land available to bring the lot area into conformity. <br /> d. Adjusting the proposed addition to meet a 35-foot side street setback would <br /> create awkward design challenges and offer minimal benefit to the adjacent <br /> property owner. <br /> e. The proposed, partial second story will be set back an additional 9 feet for a <br /> � total of 20.7 feet from the side street lot line to reduce massing. <br /> f. The Applicants' request will not alter the essential character of the <br /> neighborhood and will result in minimal negative impact on adjacent <br /> properties. <br /> g. The Applicants' request is in hannony with the purpose and intent of the <br /> ordinance. <br /> h. The Applicants have demonstrated that enforcing the setback provisions of the <br /> Zoning Ordinance deprive the applicants of the reasonable use of their <br /> property. <br /> 4. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and <br /> recommendation of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by <br /> the applicants and the public, and the effect of the proposed variance on the <br /> health, safety and welfare of the community. <br /> ( <br /> Page 2 of 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.