My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1981-04-06 Memo, Septic System Inspection Notes
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
B
>
Brown Road South
>
430 Brown Road South - PID: 03-117-23-42-0011
>
Septic
>
1981-04-06 Memo, Septic System Inspection Notes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/18/2024 11:07:13 AM
Creation date
9/18/2024 11:04:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
x Address Old
House Number
430
Street Name
Brown
Street Type
Road
Street Direction
South
Address
430 Brown Road South
PIN
0311723420011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
TO;Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoninq Administrate’" <br />FROM; <br />DATE: <br />SUBJECT; <br />Michael P. Gaffron, Septic Systems Inspector <br />April 6, 1981 <br />#609, Subdivision, Ruxton Strong, 420 Brown Road South <br />Septic System/Soil Testing Review <br />On March 31, 1981, I inspected the Strong property to review <br />the existing septic system and the proposed drainfield sites <br />on the 2 new lots to bo created. <br />Lot 1. This lot contains the existing residence on about <br />1.5 contiguous dry acres, separated from the remainder <br />of the dry land by a 1+ acre wetland. The house and <br />well are situated so as to leave suitable area for <br />a replacement drainfield. The non-contiguous 0.5 <br />acre dry land has no realistic use as future drainfield. <br />The existing septic system consists of 2 concrete <br />tanks and an unknown amount of drainfield. I noted <br />that the 2nd tank had what appeared to be a hose <br />(attached to a pump?) leading to the wetlands, with <br />with a wooden support structure extending the hose into <br />the wetlands. This leads one to surmise that the <br />Strongs may be pumping sewage into the wetland, which <br />is a violation of the on-site ordinance. The system <br />appears to need some attention and I would recommend <br />that subdivision approval include a stipulation that <br />the existing system be suitably repaired/upgraded <br />to City standards. <br />Lot 2. This lot is quite sloped and contains some area not <br />suited for drainfield due to steep slopes. The tested <br />drainfield sites indicate fair soils for drainfield, <br />but this location also appears to lie directly in the <br />must likely driveway 'ocess from the cul-de-sac. I <br />W3uid rocojnmend approval of this lot as-is, but the <br />applicant: should be ferewarned that should the driveway <br />or house location enor«)ach on the t<*’ted drainfield <br />;ites, retesting would be re.uired ax the time a building <br />pennit is requested. <br />Lot 3. This lot has an ample area of f-.ir sclxs for use as <br />drainfield. House location should .■»ot pose any major <br />problems.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.