Laserfiche WebLink
.*»• V >. »J'■^r^'^jr-r-jmM ■'“ikm”«•■•■“* SSS*«SKS!*»f|T7iir'** gg^tlcf*? o* w"-” V5SfSr<5«»w «w***^ ^^..rt***** <br />aiS- “ Si\fK 5S*‘- -—■ <br />tw ‘wiis: irt«“ •*•’• <br />>y «onin9 0*p**^*^_______________P»t<^ ___SS <br />I** 8i9n»t«r«^________ _______ ^ r«atttt«* ®* <br />——----- 4 a. all ln«oni*tlo» and/©* <br />MS ioc«**V^ 4. tru© »®* corr«w <br />—rrii^tt©!© ^»^®^2SiSsio» ii©«^^“«*/Vi ?•«*»•*'**■ 4* <br />• hsv© »lan»i»9/®VlVVb© P****®S!^*S ^1[sslon H©©ti«J* Applicant* •©•J ^Jicil. X«^ **?o !»•©• *® <br />■ ”” <br />WMtorfe-r <br />Cu® to the increased sideyard recjuiremen ts under the ne»r«ier ordinance* I am requesting a s/diriancB for the sideyard setbacks in order tio add to my existing home. My present lot is typical of manv of the older lake lots in this area in that it is long and narrcaw (5C)' x 625). My existing home is situated nearly 200* back from the lake and the existing sideyards are a little over 9 fee*c on the north side arid feet on tne scxith side. I do wi^h tochange these setbacks all of mv additi.jn ls vertical, tut the new ordinance requires 30 sideyard? uv^hicn are impose idle on a fi.' l-r. The footer in t o- tlie hcxiss will remain the same as 1 am simply auoing sotie- bedrooins abo'vs the existing structure for us and the new babv. Uie ask ycxir* approval to leave the <br />existing sideyarTl setbacks as Uey presisntly exist* which tnet the requi» enents <br />at the ti:7ie the heuse ^3 .xilt out no icnaer Ti-^et zro side/ard <br />reguiraments of Fjr this we request a s..oeva^d =e-/i::^ack variance. <br />Thfink ycu again for yoLtr help in this matter <br />Blake Bichanich <br />BEcr.nj.